• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可手术切除食管癌的新辅助放化疗剂量水平:使用情况及预后的预测因素

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation radiation dose levels for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: predictors of use and outcomes.

作者信息

Buckstein M, Rhome R, Ru M, Moshier E

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2018 May 1;31(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox148.

DOI:10.1093/dote/dox148
PMID:29309563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5993676/
Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgical resection is the standard of care for resectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer. There are promising results using 41.4 Gy relative to historical controls using higher doses, but the utilization and efficacy of lower neoadjuvant radiation dosing is unclear. This study uses the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to explore patterns of care for neoadjuvant CRT dose levels and outcomes. The NCDB was queried for localized invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) receiving neoadjuvant CRT with doses from 40 to 54 Gy followed by surgical resection. Patients were divided into radiation levels: 40-41.4, 45, 50.4, and 54 Gy, respectively. Factors predicting use of 40-41.4 Gy vs. all other dose levels were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were compared using univariate and multivariate modeling. A total of 6,274 patients with AC (n = 5,176) or SCC (n = 1,098) receiving neoadjuvant CRT and definitive resection were identified. Hispanic race (OR 2.67 [95% CI 1.22-5.81]) and treatment at an academic center (OR 2.72 [95% CI 1.15-6.41]) predicted for use of low-dose CRT. Lower dose CRT increased from 3.9% in 2004 to 7.2% in 2013. There was no difference in OS when stratified according to radiation dose level (P = 0.48). Multivariable analysis found private/government insurance, higher education, higher median income, and treatment at an academic center were associated with improved OS. Age, male gender, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, stage, tumor grade, and treatment in the South were associated with worse OS. Use of lower neoadjuvant CRT dose is more common at academic centers and shows possible increasing usage. Neoadjuvant radiation dose for esophageal cancer is not associated with differences in OS in this large database.

摘要

新辅助放化疗(CRT)后行手术切除是可切除的局部晚期食管癌的标准治疗方法。与使用更高剂量的历史对照相比,使用41.4 Gy有令人鼓舞的结果,但较低新辅助放疗剂量的应用和疗效尚不清楚。本研究使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)来探讨新辅助CRT剂量水平的治疗模式和结果。在NCDB中查询接受40至54 Gy新辅助CRT后行手术切除的局限性浸润性食管腺癌(AC)或鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。患者被分为放疗水平:分别为40 - 41.4、45、50.4和54 Gy。使用多变量逻辑回归比较预测使用40 - 41.4 Gy与所有其他剂量水平的因素。使用单变量和多变量模型比较影响总生存期(OS)的因素。共确定了6274例接受新辅助CRT和根治性切除的AC患者(n = 5176)或SCC患者(n = 1098)。西班牙裔种族(OR 2.67 [95% CI 1.22 - 5.81])和在学术中心接受治疗(OR 2.72 [95% CI 1.15 - 6.41])预测会使用低剂量CRT。低剂量CRT从2004年的3.9%增加到2013年的7.2%。根据放疗剂量水平分层时,OS没有差异(P = 0.48)。多变量分析发现,私人/政府保险、高等教育、较高的收入中位数和在学术中心接受治疗与OS改善相关。年龄、男性、Charlson - Deyo合并症评分、分期、肿瘤分级和在南方接受治疗与较差的OS相关。较低新辅助CRT剂量的使用在学术中心更为常见,且使用量可能在增加。在这个大型数据库中,食管癌的新辅助放疗剂量与OS差异无关。

相似文献

1
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation radiation dose levels for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: predictors of use and outcomes.可手术切除食管癌的新辅助放化疗剂量水平:使用情况及预后的预测因素
Dis Esophagus. 2018 May 1;31(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox148.
2
Low- vs. High-Dose Neoadjuvant Radiation in Trimodality Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.低剂量与高剂量新辅助放疗在局部进展期食管癌三联治疗中的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 May;23(5):885-894. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4007-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Radiation dose and pathological response in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery: a multi-institutional analysis.新辅助放化疗后手术治疗食管癌患者的辐射剂量与病理反应:多机构分析。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1358-1365. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1646432. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
Higher Doses of Neoadjuvant Radiation for Esophageal Cancer Do Not Affect the Pathologic Complete Response Rate or Survival: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.高剂量新辅助放疗对食管癌病理完全缓解率和生存率无影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;27(2):500-508. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07849-z. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer : Outcomes and patterns of failure.新辅助放化疗与根治性放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌:结局和失败模式。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Feb;194(2):116-124. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1211-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Radiation field size and dose determine oncologic outcome in esophageal cancer.放射野大小和剂量决定食管癌的肿瘤学结局。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct 13;14(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1024-0.
7
A retrospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced esophageal cancer.局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗方案的回顾性比较
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox025.
8
Radiation Dose Escalation in Esophageal Cancer Revisited: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2004 to 2012.食管癌放疗剂量递增的再探讨:2004 年至 2012 年国家癌症数据库的当代分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Dec 1;96(5):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Treatment utilization and outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a review of the National Cancer Database.老年局部晚期食管癌患者的治疗利用情况及结局:美国国立癌症数据库综述
Cancer Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2886-2896. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1250. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
10
Single-institution retrospective comparison of preoperative versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.单机构对食管癌腺癌术前与根治性放化疗的回顾性比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3744-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3795-2. Epub 2014 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience of Low Versus High-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.食管癌术前放化疗:单中心10年低剂量与高剂量新辅助放化疗经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul;32(7):4681-4689. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17300-1. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma Esophagus: Demographics and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India.新辅助放化疗后手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌:印度一家三级医疗中心的人口统计学及预后因素评估
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(1):129-135. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01828-3. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
3
Nivolumab adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a review based on subgroup analysis of CheckMate 577 trial.纳武利尤单抗辅助治疗食管癌:基于 CheckMate 577 试验亚组分析的综述。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1264912. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1264912. eCollection 2023.
4
Safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective study.紫杉醇联合卡铂与紫杉醇联合顺铂在局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗中的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 30;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02190-4.
5
Nonregional Lymph Nodes as the Only Metastatic Site in Stage IV Esophageal Cancer.非区域淋巴结作为IV期食管癌的唯一转移部位。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Oct 20;3(12):100426. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100426. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Prognostic Effect of the Dose of Radiation Therapy and Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma.放射治疗剂量和淋巴结清扫范围对接受新辅助放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者的预后影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 28;11(17):5059. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175059.
7
The Key Clinical Questions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer-A Review.可切除食管癌新辅助放化疗的关键临床问题——综述
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 14;12:890688. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.890688. eCollection 2022.
8
Gross Tumor Volume Predicts Survival and Pathological Complete Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.肿瘤总体积可预测局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗后的生存及病理完全缓解情况。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 7;12:898383. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898383. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of Pathologic Complete Response Rates and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Surgically Resectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation to 50.4 Gy vs 41.4 Gy.接受新辅助放化疗剂量为50.4 Gy与41.4 Gy的可手术切除食管癌患者的病理完全缓解率及肿瘤学结局比较
Cureus. 2021 Nov 3;13(11):e19233. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19233. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Omitting surgery in esophageal cancer patients with complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助放化疗后完全缓解的食管癌患者省略手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Nov 14;16(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01947-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.前往高容量中心就医与食管癌患者生存率提高相关。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):743-749. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001702.
2
Radiation Dose Escalation in Esophageal Cancer Revisited: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2004 to 2012.食管癌放疗剂量递增的再探讨:2004 年至 2012 年国家癌症数据库的当代分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Dec 1;96(5):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
3
Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.食管癌切除术后死亡率受中心手术量的严重影响:全国住院患者样本的回顾性分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
4
Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.老年食管癌患者的放疗方式使用与心肺死亡风险
Cancer. 2016 Mar 15;122(6):917-28. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29857. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Preoperative carboplatin and paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: results of a modified CROSS regimen utilizing radiation doses greater than 41.4 Gy.术前基于卡铂和紫杉醇的食管癌放化疗:采用大于41.4 Gy放射剂量的改良CROSS方案的结果
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Aug;29(6):614-20. doi: 10.1111/dote.12377. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials.CROSS 试验中单手术治疗与术前放化疗加手术治疗后的复发模式。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;32(5):385-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.2186. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Propensity score-based comparison of long-term outcomes with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.基于倾向评分的食管癌 3 维适形放疗与调强放疗长期疗效比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Dec 1;84(5):1078-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.术前放化疗治疗食管或食管胃交界癌。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088.
9
State of the Multiple Imputation Software.多重填补软件的现状。
J Stat Softw. 2011 Dec;45(1). doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i01.
10
Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.使用链式方程进行多重插补:实践中的问题和指导。
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30.