Université de Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR6308 AMURE, IUEM, Plouzané, France.
Université de Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR6308 AMURE, IUEM, Plouzané, France; Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
J Environ Manage. 2018 Mar 1;209:462-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.051. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
Coral reef ecosystems and the people who depend on them are increasingly exposed to the adverse effects of global environmental change (GEC), including increases in sea-surface temperature and ocean acidification. Managers and decision-makers need a better understanding of the options available for action in the face of these changes. We refine a typology of actions developed by Gattuso et al. (2015) that could serve in prioritizing strategies to deal with the impacts of GEC on reefs and people. Using the typology we refined, we investigate the scientific effort devoted to four types of management strategies: mitigate, protect, repair, adapt that we tie to the components of the chain of impact they affect: ecological vulnerability or social vulnerability. A systematic literature review is used to investigate quantitatively how scientific effort over the past 25 years is responding to the challenge posed by GEC on coral reefs and to identify gaps in research. A growing literature has focused on these impacts and on management strategies to sustain coral reef social-ecological systems. We identify 767 peer reviewed articles published between 1990 and 2016 that address coral reef management in the context of GEC. The rate of publication of such studies has increased over the years, following the general trend in climate research. The literature focuses on protect strategies the most, followed by mitigate and adapt strategies, and finally repair strategies. Developed countries, particularly Australia and the United States, are over-represented as authors and locations of case studies across all types of management strategies. Authors affiliated in developed countries play a major role in investigating case studies across the globe. The majority of articles focus on only one of the four categories of actions. A gap analysis reveals three directions for future research: (1) more research is needed in South-East Asia and other developing countries where the impacts of GEC on coral reefs will be the greatest, (2) more scholarly effort should be devoted to understanding how adapt and repair strategies can deal with the impacts of GEC, and (3) the simultaneous assessment of multiple strategies is needed to understand trade-offs and synergies between actions.
珊瑚礁生态系统及其赖以生存的人们越来越容易受到全球环境变化(GEC)的不利影响,包括海平面温度和海洋酸化的升高。管理者和决策者需要更好地了解面对这些变化时可采取的行动方案。我们对 Gattuso 等人(2015 年)提出的行动方案分类法进行了改进,该分类法可用于优先考虑应对 GEC 对珊瑚礁和人类影响的战略。我们使用改进后的分类法,研究了用于四种管理策略的科学努力:减轻、保护、修复和适应,我们将这些策略与它们影响的影响链组件联系起来:生态脆弱性或社会脆弱性。系统文献综述用于定量研究过去 25 年来,科学努力如何应对 GEC 对珊瑚礁带来的挑战,并确定研究中的空白。越来越多的文献集中在这些影响以及维持珊瑚礁社会生态系统的管理策略上。我们确定了 1990 年至 2016 年间发表的 767 篇涉及 GEC 背景下珊瑚礁管理的同行评议文章。此类研究的出版率随着气候研究的总体趋势逐年增加。文献主要关注保护策略,其次是减轻和适应策略,最后是修复策略。发达国家,特别是澳大利亚和美国,在所有类型的管理策略中,作为作者和案例研究地点的代表性过高。在发达国家工作的作者在全球范围内开展案例研究方面发挥了重要作用。大多数文章只关注四个行动类别中的一个。差距分析显示了未来研究的三个方向:(1)在东南亚和其他发展中国家,需要更多的研究来了解 GEC 对珊瑚礁的影响,这些国家的影响最大;(2)需要投入更多的学术努力来了解适应和修复策略如何应对 GEC 的影响;(3)需要同时评估多种策略,以了解行动之间的权衡和协同作用。