Suppr超能文献

主动脉弓中断患者双侧肺动脉环缩术后双心室修复成功相关因素的评估

Evaluation of Factors Associated With Achievement of Biventricular Repair After Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Banding in Patients With Interrupted Aortic Arch.

作者信息

Hirano Yasuhiro, Inamura Noboru, Kawazu Yukiko, Aoki Hisaaki, Kayatani Futoshi, Iwai Shigemitsu, Kawata Hiroaki

机构信息

1 Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Izumi, Osaka, Japan.

2 Department of Pediatrics, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2018 Jan;9(1):54-59. doi: 10.1177/2150135117737685.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At our institution, we perform bilateral pulmonary artery banding (BPAB) as the first-stage palliation for interrupted aortic arch (IAA) with low birth weight or severe subaortic stenosis (SAS). The present study aimed to identify factors that may influence the decision regarding the type of second-stage operation, that is, univentricular palliation or biventricular repair, in these patients.

METHODS

Cardiac catheterization and angiographic data of nine patients with IAA who underwent initial BPAB and subsequent univentricular or biventricular repair were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2014, of nine patients with IAA who underwent initial BPAB, biventricular repair was subsequently performed in six patients (group B) and univentricular repair in three patients (group U). All patients survived. There was no significant intergroup difference in IAA classification, location of ventricular septal defect, presence of 22q11.2 deletion, presence of aberrant right subclavian artery, band diameter, or post-BPAB pulmonary artery pressure and index. Timing of BPAB and the body weight at the time of BPAB, however, differed significantly between the groups ( P = .02). Catheter data before BPAB were not significantly different between the groups, with the exception of the degree of subaortic stenosis (or hypoplasia of the left ventricular outflow tract) expressed as percentage of the normal end-systolic aortic valve annular diameter for patient body surface area. This metric (%SAS before BPAB) was significantly higher in group B (60%-68%) than in group U (47%-60%; P = .04). Among patients for whom baseline %SAS was < 60%, the %SAS did not increase after BPAB.

CONCLUSION

The most important factor that allowed biventricular repair was not the pulmonary artery pressure or diameter but the degree of SAS. Patients who initially had more severe SAS ultimately underwent univentricular repair due to lack of substantial improvement in dimensions of the left ventricular outflow tract after BPAB.

摘要

背景

在我们机构,对于出生体重低或严重主动脉瓣下狭窄(SAS)的主动脉弓中断(IAA)患者,我们将双侧肺动脉环扎术(BPAB)作为一期姑息治疗。本研究旨在确定可能影响这些患者二期手术类型决策的因素,即单心室姑息治疗或双心室修复。

方法

回顾性分析了9例接受初始BPAB及随后单心室或双心室修复的IAA患者的心脏导管检查和血管造影数据。

结果

2004年至2014年期间,9例接受初始BPAB的IAA患者中,6例随后进行了双心室修复(B组),3例进行了单心室修复(U组)。所有患者均存活。两组在IAA分类、室间隔缺损位置、22q11.2缺失情况、迷走右锁骨下动脉情况、环扎带直径、BPAB术后肺动脉压力及指数方面无显著组间差异。然而,两组间BPAB的时机及BPAB时的体重差异显著(P = 0.02)。BPAB前的导管数据在两组间无显著差异,但以患者体表面积的正常收缩期末主动脉瓣环直径百分比表示的主动脉瓣下狭窄(或左心室流出道发育不全)程度除外。该指标(BPAB前%SAS)在B组(60% - 68%)显著高于U组(47% - 60%;P = 0.04)。在基线%SAS < 60%的患者中,BPAB后%SAS未增加。

结论

允许进行双心室修复的最重要因素不是肺动脉压力或直径,而是SAS的程度。最初SAS更严重的患者最终因BPAB后左心室流出道尺寸未得到实质性改善而接受了单心室修复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验