Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):612-620. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4247-z. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
Care management and care managers are becoming increasingly prevalent in primary care medical practice as a means of improving population health and reducing unnecessary care. Care managers are often involved in chronic disease management and associated transitional care. In this study, we examined the communication regarding chronic disease care within 24 primary care practices in Michigan and Colorado. We sought to answer the following questions: Do care managers play a key role in chronic disease management in the practice? Does the prominence of the care manager's connectivity within the practice's communication network vary by the type of care management structure implemented?
Individual written surveys were given to all practice members in the participating practices. Survey questions assessed demographics as well as practice culture, quality improvement, care management activities, and communication regarding chronic disease care. Using social network analysis and other statistical methods, we analyzed the communication dynamics related to chronic disease care for each practice.
The structure of chronic disease communication varies greatly from practice to practice. Care managers who were embedded in the practice or co-located were more likely to be in the core of the communication network than were off-site care managers. These care managers also had higher in-degree centrality, indicating that they acted as a hub for communication with team members in many other roles.
Social network analysis provided a useful means of examining chronic disease communication in practice, and highlighted the central role of care managers in this communication when their role structure supported such communication. Structuring care managers as embedded team members within the practice has important implications for their role in chronic disease communication within primary care.
作为改善人口健康和减少不必要医疗的手段,医疗保健管理和管理人员在初级保健医疗实践中越来越普遍。管理人员通常参与慢性病管理和相关的过渡性护理。在这项研究中,我们检查了密歇根州和科罗拉多州的 24 家初级保健实践中关于慢性病护理的沟通情况。我们试图回答以下问题:管理人员在实践中的慢性病管理中是否发挥关键作用?管理人员在实践沟通网络中的连接的突出程度是否因实施的护理管理结构类型而异?
向参与实践的所有实践成员发放了个人书面调查问卷。调查问题评估了人口统计学以及实践文化、质量改进、护理管理活动以及关于慢性病护理的沟通情况。我们使用社会网络分析和其他统计方法,分析了每个实践与慢性病护理相关的沟通动态。
慢性病沟通的结构在实践中差异很大。嵌入或同地办公的管理人员更有可能成为沟通网络的核心,而不在现场的管理人员则不然。这些管理人员的入度中心性也更高,这表明他们在许多其他角色中充当与团队成员沟通的枢纽。
社会网络分析为检查实践中的慢性病沟通提供了一种有用的方法,并突出了管理人员在这种沟通中的核心作用,尤其是当他们的角色结构支持这种沟通时。将管理人员构造成实践中的嵌入式团队成员,对他们在初级保健中的慢性病沟通中的作用具有重要意义。