• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重疾病护理问责制的数据需求:框架和建议。

Data Needs for a Serious Illness Care Accountability System: A Framework and Recommendations.

机构信息

Discern Health , Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S1-S6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0596.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2017.0596
PMID:29313756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5756462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful implementation of a comprehensive accountability system for community-based serious illness care will require a robust data infrastructure. Data will be needed to support care delivery, quality measurement, value-based payment, and evaluation and monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

The specific data needs in these areas need to be identified and understood, so that gaps in currently available data may be addressed.

DESIGN

We developed a framework that includes the needed data and data infrastructure to support the features and characteristics of a serious illness care accountability system. Based on this framework, we analyze the current data landscape to identify gaps in available data resources and capacities. This analysis was informed by conducting Internet-based research, interviews with key informants, and a survey of key informants.

RESULTS

Based on the identified gaps, we present a series of priority recommendations for advancing the data infrastructure to support community-based serious illness care. These recommendations include additional measurement of patient-reported outcomes, increasing interoperability among various data sources, increasing development and exchange of patient care plans, leveraging newly standardized data on patient functional and cognitive status, and using patient-reported information for clinical decision support at the point of care.

CONCLUSION

There are significant unmet data needs for a comprehensive accountability system in serious illness care, but these gaps can be prioritized and addressed through alignment and collaboration across stakeholders.

摘要

背景

成功实施社区重大疾病照护综合问责制需要有强大的数据基础设施。需要数据来支持护理服务、质量衡量、基于价值的支付以及评估和监测。

目的

需要确定并了解这些领域的具体数据需求,以便解决当前可用数据中的差距。

设计

我们开发了一个框架,其中包括支持重大疾病照护问责制的功能和特点所需的数据和数据基础设施。基于该框架,我们分析了当前的数据情况,以确定现有数据资源和能力中的差距。这项分析是通过进行基于互联网的研究、与关键信息提供者的访谈以及对关键信息提供者的调查得出的。

结果

根据确定的差距,我们提出了一系列优先建议,以推进支持社区重大疾病照护的数据基础设施。这些建议包括增加患者报告结果的测量、增加各种数据源之间的互操作性、增加患者护理计划的开发和交流、利用新标准化的患者功能和认知状态数据以及在护理点使用患者报告信息进行临床决策支持。

结论

重大疾病照护综合问责制存在重大的数据需求未得到满足,但通过利益相关者之间的协调和合作,可以确定并优先解决这些差距。

相似文献

1
Data Needs for a Serious Illness Care Accountability System: A Framework and Recommendations.严重疾病护理问责制的数据需求:框架和建议。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S1-S6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0596.
2
Accountability for the Quality of Care Provided to People with Serious Illness.为患有重病的人提供的护理质量的问责制。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S68-S73. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0603.
3
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
4
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
5
Accountability for Community-Based Programs for the Seriously Ill.为重病患者提供社区服务项目的问责制。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S81-S87. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0583. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
6
Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges.利用电子健康记录提高重病患者护理质量测量和问责制的机会与挑战
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S52-S60. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0542. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Identifying and addressing gaps in the implementation of a community care team for care of Patients with multiple chronic conditions.确定和解决社区护理团队在照顾患有多种慢性疾病患者方面实施过程中的差距。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4709-6.
8
Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives.衡量对重病患者的以患者为中心的护理:问责制倡议的挑战和机遇。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S28-S35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0452. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
9
The training for health equity network evaluation framework: a pilot study at five health professional schools.健康公平网络评估框架培训:在五所健康职业学校开展的一项试点研究
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 May-Aug;27(2):116-26. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.143727.
10
The impact of health information technology on collaborative chronic care management.健康信息技术对协作式慢性病管理的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Mar;14(2 Suppl):S3-11.

本文引用的文献

1
The Problems With Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱存在的问题。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):259-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17362.
2
Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries.代理报告结果与患者报告结果的差异:评估医疗保险受益人的健康和功能状况。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Aug 12;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7.
3
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
4
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?护理质量。如何对其进行评估?
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743.