Suppr超能文献

比较五种特定检测方法在入组 START-Laboratory 登记库的患者中检测达比加群血浆浓度的效果。

Comparison of five specific assays for determination of dabigatran plasma concentrations in patients enrolled in the START-Laboratory Register.

机构信息

Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Haemostasis and Thrombosis Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AO Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Lab Hematol. 2018 Apr;40(2):229-236. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12772. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several specific assays are commercially available to determine dabigatran anticoagulant activity. Aims of this multicenter and multiplatform study were to compare five methods for dabigatran measurement and investigate their performances in the low concentration range.

METHODS

Dabigatran levels were analyzed in 295 plasma samples from patients enrolled in the START-Laboratory Register by the following methods using dedicated calibrators and controls: STA-ECA II (Diagnostica Stago), standard and low range Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitors (Hyphen BioMed), Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay (Instrumentation Laboratory), Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay (Siemens), Technoclot DTI (Technoclone).

RESULTS

Methods showed variable agreement with the Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitors assay used as reference test, with modest under- or overestimations (Bland-Altman bias from -17.3 to 4.0 ng/mL). Limits of detection and quantification varied depending on the assay (4-52 and 7-82 ng/mL, respectively). Between-run precision and accuracy were good for all methods for both quality control levels. Assay's repeatability assessed at very low dabigatran concentrations (from 10 to 60 ng/mL) was also acceptable, variability generally increased at lower drug levels.

CONCLUSION

The five dabigatran-specific assays evaluated in this study provided reliable assessment of dabigatran plasma levels, although showing different performances.

摘要

简介

有几种特定的检测方法可用于确定达比加群的抗凝活性。本多中心、多平台研究的目的是比较五种达比加群测量方法,并研究它们在低浓度范围内的性能。

方法

通过使用专用校准品和对照品,在来自参加 START-Laboratory 登记研究的 295 名患者的血浆样本中分析达比加群水平:STA-ECA II(Diagnostica Stago)、标准和低范围的 Hemoclot 凝血酶抑制剂(Hyphen BioMed)、直接凝血酶抑制剂测定法(Instrumentation Laboratory)、直接凝血酶抑制剂测定法(Siemens)、Technoclot DTI(Technoclone)。

结果

方法与作为参考检测的 Hemoclot 凝血酶抑制剂检测法显示出不同的一致性,存在适度的低估或高估(Bland-Altman 偏倚范围从-17.3 至 4.0ng/mL)。检测限和定量限因检测方法而异(分别为 4-52 和 7-82ng/mL)。对于所有方法,两种质控水平的批内精密度和准确度均良好。在非常低的达比加群浓度(10-60ng/mL)下评估的测定法的重复性也可接受,通常在药物浓度较低时,变异性增加。

结论

本研究评估的五种达比加群特异性检测方法可可靠地评估达比加群的血浆水平,尽管表现出不同的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验