Hoang Tuong-Van, Nardiello Claudio, Surate Solaligue David E, Rodríguez-Castillo José Alberto, Rath Philipp, Mayer Konstantin, Vadász István, Herold Susanne, Ahlbrecht Kathrin, Seeger Werner, Morty Rory E
Department of Lung Development and Remodelling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine (Pulmonology), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Giessen, Germany.
J Anat. 2018 Mar;232(3):472-484. doi: 10.1111/joa.12773. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
The quantitative assessment of the lung architecture forms the foundation of many studies on lung development and lung diseases, where parameters such as alveoli number, alveolar size, and septal thickness are quantitatively influenced by developmental or pathological processes. Given the pressing need for robust data that describe the lung structure, there is currently much enthusiasm for the development and refinement of methodological approaches for the unbiased assessment of lung structure with improved precision. The advent of stereological methods highlights one such approach. However, design-based stereology is both expensive and time-demanding. The objective of this study was to examine whether 'limited' stereological analysis, such as the stereological analysis of a single mouse lung lobe, may serve as a surrogate for studies on whole, intact mouse lungs; both in healthy lungs and in diseased lungs, using an experimental animal model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). This served the dual-function of exploring BPD pathobiology, asking whether there are regional (lobar) differences in the responses of developing mouse lungs to oxygen injury, by examining each mouse lung lobe separately in the BPD model. Hyperoxia exposure resulted in decreased alveolar density, alveoli number, and gas-exchange surface area in all five mouse lung lobes, and increased the arithmetic mean septal thickness in all mouse lung lobes except the lobus cardialis. The data presented here suggest that - in healthy developing mice - a single mouse lung lobe might serve as a surrogate for studies on whole, intact mouse lungs. This is not the case for oxygen-injured developing mouse lungs, where a single lobe would not be suitable as a surrogate for the whole, intact lung. Furthermore, as the total number of alveoli can only be determined by an analysis of the entire lung, and given regional differences in lung structure, particularly under pathological conditions, the stereological assessment of the whole, intact lung remains desirable.
肺结构的定量评估是许多关于肺发育和肺部疾病研究的基础,其中肺泡数量、肺泡大小和间隔厚度等参数会受到发育或病理过程的定量影响。鉴于迫切需要能够描述肺结构的可靠数据,目前人们对开发和完善用于无偏倚评估肺结构且精度更高的方法充满热情。体视学方法的出现凸显了这样一种途径。然而,基于设计的体视学既昂贵又耗时。本研究的目的是检验“有限的”体视学分析,例如对单个小鼠肺叶的体视学分析,是否可以作为对完整的、未受损的小鼠全肺进行研究的替代方法;在健康肺和患病肺中,使用支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的实验动物模型进行检验。这具有双重作用,即通过在BPD模型中分别检查每个小鼠肺叶,探索BPD的病理生物学,研究发育中的小鼠肺对氧损伤的反应是否存在区域(肺叶)差异。高氧暴露导致所有五个小鼠肺叶的肺泡密度、肺泡数量和气体交换表面积降低,并且除心叶外,所有小鼠肺叶的算术平均间隔厚度增加。此处呈现的数据表明,在健康发育的小鼠中,单个小鼠肺叶可能可以作为对完整的、未受损的小鼠全肺进行研究的替代方法。但对于氧损伤的发育中小鼠肺而言并非如此,单个肺叶不适合作为完整未受损全肺的替代。此外,由于肺泡总数只能通过对整个肺的分析来确定,并且考虑到肺结构存在区域差异,尤其是在病理条件下,对完整未受损全肺的体视学评估仍然是必要的。