Salman Popattia Amber, Winch Sarah, La Caze Adam
School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2018 Apr;26(2):93-103. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12425. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
The widespread sale of complementary medicines in community pharmacy raises important questions regarding the responsibilities of pharmacists when selling complementary medicines. This study reviews the academic literature that explores a pharmacist's responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.
International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Embase, PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Philosopher's index databases were searched for articles written in English and published between 1995 and 2017. Empirical studies discussing pharmacists' practices or perceptions, consumers' expectations and normative studies discussing ethical perspectives or proposing ethical frameworks related to pharmacists' responsibilities in selling complementary medicines were included in the review.
Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies discussing the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines had an empirical focus. Pharmacists and consumers identified counselling and ensuring safe use of complementary medicines as the primary responsibilities of pharmacists. No formal ethical framework is explicitly employed to describe the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines. To the degree any ethical framework is employed, a number of papers implicitly rely on principlism. The studies discussing the ethical perspectives of selling complementary medicines mainly describe the ethical conflict between a pharmacist's business and health professional role. No attempt is made to provide guidance on appropriate ways to resolve the conflict.
There is a lack of explicit normative advice in the existing literature regarding the responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines. This review identifies the need to develop a detailed practice-specific ethical framework to guide pharmacists regarding their responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.
社区药房中补充药物的广泛销售引发了有关药剂师在销售补充药物时责任的重要问题。本研究回顾了探讨药剂师在销售补充药物时责任的学术文献。
在国际药学文摘数据库、Embase数据库、PubMed数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、心理学文摘数据库和哲学家索引数据库中检索1995年至2017年间发表的英文文章。本综述纳入了讨论药剂师的实践或认知、消费者期望的实证研究,以及讨论与药剂师销售补充药物责任相关的伦理观点或提出伦理框架的规范性研究。
58项研究符合纳入标准。大多数讨论药剂师销售补充药物责任的研究侧重于实证。药剂师和消费者将咨询和确保补充药物的安全使用确定为药剂师的主要责任。没有正式的伦理框架被明确用于描述药剂师销售补充药物的责任。在一定程度上,若采用任何伦理框架,一些论文隐含地依赖于原则主义。讨论销售补充药物伦理观点的研究主要描述了药剂师的商业角色与健康专业人员角色之间的伦理冲突。未尝试就解决冲突的适当方式提供指导。
现有文献中缺乏关于药剂师销售补充药物责任的明确规范性建议。本综述确定需要制定一个详细的针对具体实践的伦理框架,以指导药剂师在销售补充药物时的责任。