The University of Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland, Australia.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):850-857. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
Whether pharmacists should sell complementary medicines that lack evidence of effectiveness is an important ethical question which is not explicitly addressed in the existing literature or professional guidelines. The question arises because many complementary medicines lack rigorous evidence that they are effective. There is a need for specific practical guidance for pharmacists regarding their responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.
Outline and defend an ethical framework for the responsibilities of pharmacists when selling complementary medicines.
Principle-based ethics consists in the application of the four bioethical principles to make decisions in healthcare. A public health argument is provided that supports the sale of complementary medicines in pharmacy providing pharmacists meet a number of specific professional responsibilities. The theoretical resources provided by principle-based ethics are used to develop and defend a framework for the responsibilities of pharmacists when selling complementary medicines. The proposed framework is defended against counter-arguments that propose a stricter or more lenient approach.
The framework identifies the following responsibilities of pharmacists selling complementary medicines: (1) pharmacists should provide evidence-based recommendations to consumers regarding complementary medicines, (2) pharmacists should train all staff in a pharmacy to ensure that they provide evidence-based recommendations regarding complementary medicines and refer to a pharmacist when required, (3) when providing advice, pharmacists should provide sufficient information for consumers to make informed decisions, (4) pharmacists should setup the pharmacy so that consumers are offered advice from a pharmacist when purchasing complementary medicines; pharmacists need to be available to provide that advice, and (5) pharmacists must be vigilant for complementary medicine harm and intervene if risk of harm is significant.
The framework provides practical guidance for pharmacists regarding their responsibilities when selling complementary medicines.
药剂师是否应该销售缺乏有效性证据的补充药物,这是一个重要的伦理问题,在现有文献或专业准则中并未明确提及。这个问题之所以出现,是因为许多补充药物缺乏严格的有效性证据。药剂师在销售补充药物时,需要有具体的实践指导来明确他们的责任。
概述并捍卫药剂师在销售补充药物时的责任伦理框架。
基于原则的伦理学包括将四项生物伦理原则应用于医疗保健决策中。提出了一个公共卫生论点,支持在药房销售补充药物,前提是药剂师满足一系列特定的专业责任。基于原则的伦理学所提供的理论资源被用于开发和捍卫药剂师在销售补充药物时的责任框架。该框架针对提出更严格或更宽松方法的反论进行了辩护。
该框架确定了药剂师在销售补充药物时的以下责任:(1)药剂师应为消费者提供有关补充药物的基于证据的建议;(2)药剂师应培训所有药店员工,确保他们提供有关补充药物的基于证据的建议,并在需要时向药剂师咨询;(3)提供建议时,药剂师应为消费者提供做出明智决策所需的充分信息;(4)药剂师应设置药店,以便消费者在购买补充药物时可获得药剂师的建议;药剂师需要随时提供该建议;(5)药剂师必须警惕补充药物的危害,并在危害风险显著时进行干预。
该框架为药剂师在销售补充药物时的责任提供了实用指导。