Department of Physiotherapy, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Department of Computer Technology and Architecture, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 6;18(1):142. doi: 10.3390/s18010142.
This systematic review synthesized and analyzed clinical findings related to the effectiveness of innovative technological feedback for tackling functional gait recovery. An electronic search of PUBMED, PEDro, WOS, CINAHL, and DIALNET was conducted from January 2011 to December 2016. The main inclusion criteria were: patients with modified or abnormal gait; application of technology-based feedback to deal with functional recovery of gait; any comparison between different kinds of feedback applied by means of technology, or any comparison between technological and non-technological feedback; and randomized controlled trials. Twenty papers were included. The populations were neurological patients (75%), orthopedic and healthy subjects. All participants were adults, bar one. Four studies used exoskeletons, 6 load platforms and 5 pressure sensors. The breakdown of the type of feedback used was as follows: 60% visual, 40% acoustic and 15% haptic. 55% used terminal feedback versus 65% simultaneous feedback. Prescriptive feedback was used in 60% of cases, while 50% used descriptive feedback. 62.5% and 58.33% of the trials showed a significant effect in improving step length and speed, respectively. Efficacy in improving other gait parameters such as balance or range of movement is observed in more than 75% of the studies with significant outcomes.
Treatments based on feedback using innovative technology in patients with abnormal gait are mostly effective in improving gait parameters and therefore useful for the functional recovery of patients. The most frequently highlighted types of feedback were immediate visual feedback followed by terminal and immediate acoustic feedback.
本系统综述综合分析了与创新技术反馈在解决功能性步态恢复方面的有效性相关的临床发现。从 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,我们对 PUBMED、PEDro、WOS、CINAHL 和 DIALNET 进行了电子检索。主要纳入标准为:有异常步态改变的患者;应用基于技术的反馈来处理步态功能恢复;任何对不同类型技术反馈的比较,或技术反馈与非技术反馈的比较;随机对照试验。共纳入 20 篇文献。研究人群为神经科患者(75%)、矫形科患者和健康受试者。所有参与者均为成年人,除 1 例外。4 项研究使用了外骨骼,6 项研究使用了负重平台,5 项研究使用了压力传感器。反馈的类型如下:60%视觉,40%听觉,15%触觉。55%使用终端反馈,65%使用同步反馈。60%的试验采用了规定性反馈,50%的试验采用了描述性反馈。62.5%和 58.33%的试验分别在改善步长和速度方面显示出显著效果。在 75%以上具有显著结果的研究中,观察到对改善平衡或运动范围等其他步态参数的疗效。
基于创新技术反馈的治疗方法对异常步态患者大多是有效的,能改善步态参数,因此有助于患者的功能恢复。最常强调的反馈类型是即时视觉反馈,其次是终端和即时听觉反馈。