Suppr超能文献

助听器噪声抑制与工作记忆功能。

Hearing aid noise suppression and working memory function.

作者信息

Neher Tobias, Wagener Kirsten C, Fischer Rosa-Linde

机构信息

a Medizinische Physik and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" , Carl-von-Ossietzky University , Oldenburg , Germany.

b Institute of Clinical Research , University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(5):335-344. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1423118. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research findings concerning the relation between benefit from hearing aid (HA) noise suppression and working memory function are inconsistent. The current study thus investigated the effects of three noise suppression algorithms on auditory working memory and the relation with reading span.

DESIGN

Using a computer simulation of bilaterally fitted HAs, four settings were tested: (1) unprocessed, (2) directional microphones, (3) single-channel noise reduction, and (4) binaural coherence-based noise reduction. Settings 2-4 were matched in terms of the speech-weighted signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement. Auditory working memory was assessed at +6 dB SNR using listening span and N-back paradigms.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty experienced HA users aged 55-80 years with large differences in reading span.

RESULTS

For the listening span measurements, there was an influence of HA setting on sentence-final word recognition and recall, with the directional microphones leading to ∼6% better performance than the single-channel noise reduction. For the N-back measurements, there was substantial test-retest variability and no influence of HA setting. No interactions with reading span were found.

CONCLUSION

HA noise suppression may affect the recognition and recall of speech at positive SNRs, irrespective of individual reading span. Future work should improve the reliability of the auditory working memory measurements.

摘要

目的

关于助听器(HA)噪声抑制的益处与工作记忆功能之间关系的研究结果并不一致。因此,本研究调查了三种噪声抑制算法对听觉工作记忆的影响以及与阅读广度的关系。

设计

使用双侧佩戴助听器的计算机模拟,测试了四种设置:(1)未处理,(2)方向性麦克风,(3)单通道降噪,以及(4)基于双耳相干性的降噪。设置2至4在语音加权信噪比(SNR)改善方面进行了匹配。使用听力广度和N-back范式在信噪比为+6dB时评估听觉工作记忆。

研究样本

20名年龄在55至80岁之间、阅读广度差异较大的有经验的助听器使用者。

结果

对于听力广度测量,助听器设置对句末单词识别和回忆有影响,方向性麦克风的表现比单通道降噪约好6%。对于N-back测量,测试-再测试存在很大变异性,且助听器设置没有影响。未发现与阅读广度的相互作用。

结论

无论个体阅读广度如何,助听器噪声抑制可能会影响正信噪比时语音的识别和回忆。未来的工作应提高听觉工作记忆测量的可靠性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验