Kazyak Emily, Stange Mathew
a University of Nebraska-Lincoln , Lincoln , Nebraska , USA.
b Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies , Mathematica Policy Research , Lincoln , Nebraska , USA.
J Homosex. 2018;65(14):2028-2052. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423216. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
Following Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage remains controversial and anti-LGBT state legislation has been passed, which raises questions about whether the Supreme Court's ruling may have created a backlash. We use data from two waves of a general population survey of Nebraskans conducted before and after the decision to answer three questions. First, we test three theories of how the court decision influenced public opinion. We find that support for same-sex marriage was significantly higher following the ruling, suggesting that there was not a backlash to it. Second, we assess whether people perceive that the court accurately reflects the public's opinion. We find that people who favor same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling refects public opinion very well; those who oppose same-sex marriage are more likely to think that the ruling does not at all reflect public opinion. Third, we examine the association between discussing gay rights and support for same-sex marriage, finding that those who talk about LGB issues very often are more likely to favor same-sex marriage. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to two of the themes of this special issue: the influence of marriage equality on Americans' understandings of marriage and the impact of marriage equality on future LGBT activism.
在奥伯格费尔诉霍奇斯案之后,同性婚姻仍然存在争议,并且一些反同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的州立法已经通过,这引发了关于最高法院的裁决是否可能引发了强烈反对的问题。我们使用在内布拉斯加州人进行的两轮普通人口调查的数据,这些调查在该裁决之前和之后进行,以回答三个问题。首先,我们测试关于法院裁决如何影响公众舆论的三种理论。我们发现,裁决后对同性婚姻的支持率显著更高,这表明并没有对其产生强烈反对。其次,我们评估人们是否认为法院准确反映了公众的意见。我们发现,支持同性婚姻的人更有可能认为该裁决很好地反映了公众意见;而反对同性婚姻的人更有可能认为该裁决完全没有反映公众意见。第三,我们研究讨论同性恋权利与支持同性婚姻之间的关联,发现那些经常谈论女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋问题的人更有可能支持同性婚姻。我们结合本期特刊的两个主题讨论这些发现的意义:婚姻平等对美国人婚姻观念的影响以及婚姻平等对未来同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者维权行动的影响。