1 Behavioral and Policy Sciences Department, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
2 Department of Psychology, Princeton University.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1334-1344. doi: 10.1177/0956797617709594. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
We propose that institutions such as the U.S. Supreme Court can lead individuals to update their perceptions of social norms, in contrast to the mixed evidence on whether institutions shape individuals' personal opinions. We studied reactions to the June 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage. In a controlled experimental setting, we found that a favorable ruling, when presented as likely, shifted perceived norms and personal attitudes toward increased support for gay marriage and gay people. Next, a five-wave longitudinal time-series study using a sample of 1,063 people found an increase in perceived social norms supporting gay marriage after the ruling but no change in personal attitudes. This pattern was replicated in a separate between-subjects data set. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that an institutional decision can change perceptions of social norms, which have been shown to guide behavior, even when individual opinions are unchanged.
我们提出,像美国最高法院这样的机构可以引导个人更新他们对社会规范的看法,而不是像机构是否塑造个人的个人意见那样存在混合证据。我们研究了对 2015 年 6 月美国最高法院支持同性婚姻的裁决的反应。在一个受控的实验环境中,我们发现有利的裁决,如果被认为很可能,会改变对同性婚姻和同性恋者的看法和个人态度,从而支持增加对同性婚姻和同性恋者的支持。接下来,一项使用 1063 人样本的五波纵向时间序列研究发现,在裁决后,支持同性婚姻的感知社会规范有所增加,但个人态度没有变化。这一模式在一个单独的被试间数据集上得到了复制。这些发现提供了第一个实验证据,证明制度决策可以改变社会规范的看法,即使个人意见不变,这些规范也被证明可以指导行为。