Suppr超能文献

在石头模拟器中的摩西技术。

Moses technology in a stone simulator.

作者信息

Ibrahim Ahmed, Badaan Shadi, Elhilali Mostafa M, Andonian Sero

机构信息

Department of Urology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Department of Urology, Alhussain University Hospital, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):127-130. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4797. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare fragmentation efficiency of the conventional regular mode of holmium laser to the Moses contact mode on a stone simulator.

METHODS

The Lumenis Pulse P120 H holmium laser system, together with Moses D/F/L fibers were used to compare regular mode with Moses contact mode in a stone simulator model using flexible ureteroscopy with artificial stones. Efficiency of laser lithotripsy was measured by procedural time. Degree of stone retropulsion was also compared between regular and Moses modes using a Likert scale from 0 (no retropulsion) to 3 (maximum retropulsion).

RESULTS

Using the stone simulator model, a significant reduction in stone retropulsion was noticed when comparing regular mode to the Moses contact mode (mean Grade 2.5 vs. Grade 1; p<0.01). When compared with the regular mode, the Moses contact mode was associated with significantly shorter procedural time during fragmentation (13.9 vs. 9.1 minutes; p≤0.01) and dusting (9.3 vs. 7.1 minutes; p≤0.01). In addition, when compared with the regular mode, the laser pedal was pressed significantly less often with the Moses mode during fragmentation (86 vs. 43 times; p<0.01) and dusting (50 vs. 26 times; p<0.01). Moses contact mode was associated with significantly higher percentage of lasing vs. pausing when compared with the regular mode for both fragmentation (0.8 J/10 Hz) and pulverization (0.4 J/50 Hz) settings (both p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the stone simulator setup, Moses technology was associated with more efficient laser lithotripsy (shorter operative time) due to significantly reduced stone retropulsion.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是在结石模拟器上比较钬激光传统常规模式与摩西接触模式的碎石效率。

方法

使用科医人脉冲P120 H钬激光系统以及摩西D/F/L光纤,在使用柔性输尿管镜和人工结石的结石模拟器模型中比较常规模式与摩西接触模式。通过手术时间来衡量激光碎石的效率。还使用从0(无后推)到3(最大后推)的李克特量表比较常规模式和摩西模式下的结石后推程度。

结果

在结石模拟器模型中,与常规模式相比,摩西接触模式下结石后推明显减少(平均等级2.5 vs. 等级1;p<0.01)。与常规模式相比,摩西接触模式在碎石过程中(13.9 vs. 9.1分钟;p≤0.01)和粉末化过程中(9.3 vs. 7.1分钟;p≤0.01)的手术时间明显更短。此外,与常规模式相比,在碎石过程中(86 vs. 43次;p<0.01)和粉末化过程中(50 vs. 26次;p<0.01),使用摩西模式时激光踏板的按压次数明显更少。与常规模式相比,在碎石(0.8 J/10 Hz)和粉碎(0.4 J/50 Hz)设置下,摩西接触模式下的激光发射与暂停的百分比明显更高(p均<0.05)。

结论

在结石模拟器设置中,由于结石后推明显减少,摩西技术与更高效的激光碎石术(手术时间更短)相关。

相似文献

1
Moses technology in a stone simulator.在石头模拟器中的摩西技术。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):127-130. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4797. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Ambulatory Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Moses Technology and Dusting Technique.
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:306. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

2
A review of the Moses effect and its applications in endourology.摩西效应及其在腔内泌尿外科中的应用综述。
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):257-264. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000239. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

2
CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E837-51. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3483. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
The evolution of lasers in urology.激光技术在泌尿科领域的演进。
Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Apr;3(2):81-9. doi: 10.1177/1756287211400494.
9
Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons.临床泌尿外科中的激光:现状与新视野
World J Urol. 2007 Jun;25(3):227-33. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0163-x. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
10
Validation of a bench model for endoscopic surgery in the upper urinary tract.
Eur Urol. 2002 Aug;42(2):175-9; discussion 180. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00265-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验