Suppr超能文献

亚洲人群中肝移植的可及性与患者生存率:共享前35例 共享后35例

Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 Post-Share 35.

作者信息

Zhang Y

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2017;8(4):173-179. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies addressing ethnic disparities and trends in liver transplantation for Asian population are scant. Objective: To examine the impact of Share 35 policy on Asian patients' access to liver transplantation and outcomes since its implementation in June 2013.

METHODS

A total of 11,910 adult white and Asian patients who were registered for deceased donor liver transplantation between 2012 and 2015, was identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Logistic regression and proportional hazard models with adjustment for demographic, clinical and geographic factors were used to model the access to liver transplantation and patient survival. Stratification on pre- and post-Share 35 periods was performed to compare the first 18 months of Share 35 policy to an equivalent period.

RESULTS

Comparison of the pre- and post-Share 35 periods showed a significant decrease in time on waiting list and higher proportions of patients receiving liver transplantation for Asian patients. Asians shared similar transplant rates as whites (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.80-1.67) but experienced significantly longer waiting time (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.92) before they received liver transplantation after Share 35 policy took effect. No significant post-transplantation survival difference was observed between Asians and whites at the 18-month outcome.

CONCLUSION

Although benefited from the Share 35 policy, Asian patients are still at greater risk of disparities in access to liver transplantation.

摘要

背景

针对亚洲人群肝移植种族差异及趋势的研究较少。目的:探讨2013年6月实施的“共享35”政策对亚洲患者肝移植可及性及预后的影响。

方法

从器官共享联合网络数据库中识别出2012年至2015年间登记接受已故供体肝移植的11910名成年白人和亚洲患者。采用逻辑回归和比例风险模型,并对人口统计学、临床和地理因素进行调整,以模拟肝移植可及性和患者生存率。对“共享35”政策实施前后进行分层,将“共享35”政策实施的前18个月与同期进行比较。

结果

“共享35”政策实施前后的比较显示,亚洲患者的等待名单时间显著缩短,接受肝移植的患者比例更高。亚洲人的移植率与白人相似(比值比:1.15,95%置信区间:0.80-1.67),但在“共享35”政策生效后接受肝移植之前,等待时间显著更长(风险比:0.56,95%置信区间:0.34-0.92)。在18个月的随访结果中,未观察到亚洲人和白人在移植后生存率上的显著差异。

结论

尽管亚洲患者受益于“共享35”政策,但在肝移植可及性方面仍面临更大的差异风险。

相似文献

4
The influence of equitable access policies and socioeconomic factors on post-liver transplant survival.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 16;41:101137. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101137. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
6
Improvements in Outcomes for Ethnic Minorities During the Share 35 Era Are Not Due to Decreased Rates of Early Graft Loss.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2018 Dec;16(6):714-720. doi: 10.6002/ect.2017.0047. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Live Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States: Impact of Share 35 on Live Donor Utilization.
Transplantation. 2021 Apr 1;105(4):824-831. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003318.
9
Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities impact post-liver transplant survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Ann Hepatol. 2023 Sep-Oct;28(5):101127. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101127. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to and utilization of living donor liver transplants.
Liver Transpl. 2015 Jul;21(7):904-13. doi: 10.1002/lt.24147. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to Measure the Impact of Structural Racism and Discrimination on Gastrointestinal and Hepatology Disease Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct;21(11):2759-2788.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
3
The influence of equitable access policies and socioeconomic factors on post-liver transplant survival.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 16;41:101137. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101137. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Donor and recipient effects on graft and patient survival.
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2013 Aug 19;2(4):152-155. doi: 10.1002/cld.223. eCollection 2013 Aug.
2
First Look: One Year Since Inception of Regional Share 35 Policy.
Transplant Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.006.
3
Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35.
Am J Transplant. 2015 Mar;15(3):659-67. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13099.
4
Impact of broader sharing on the transport time for deceased donor livers.
Liver Transpl. 2014 Oct;20(10):1237-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.23942.
5
Obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Disparate associations among Asian populations.
World J Hepatol. 2014 May 27;6(5):263-73. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i5.263.
6
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric and young adult liver transplant outcomes.
Liver Transpl. 2014 Jan;20(1):100-15. doi: 10.1002/lt.23769. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
7
NAFLD in Asia--as common and important as in the West.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;10(5):307-18. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.34. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
8
9
Impact of donor and recipient race on survival after hepatitis C-related liver transplantation.
Transplantation. 2012 Feb 27;93(4):444-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182406a94.
10
Ethnic disparities in liver transplantation.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011 May;7(5):302-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验