• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养分化学计量学和土地利用而非物种丰富度决定了植物功能多样性。

Nutrient stoichiometry and land use rather than species richness determine plant functional diversity.

作者信息

Busch Verena, Klaus Valentin H, Penone Caterina, Schäfer Deborah, Boch Steffen, Prati Daniel, Müller Jörg, Socher Stephanie A, Niinemets Ülo, Peñuelas Josep, Hölzel Norbert, Fischer Markus, Kleinebecker Till

机构信息

Institute for Landscape Ecology Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Muenster Germany.

Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Grassland Sciences ETZ Zürich Zürich Switzerland.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 3;8(1):601-616. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3609. eCollection 2018 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.3609
PMID:29321897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5756835/
Abstract

Plant functional traits reflect individual and community ecological strategies. They allow the detection of directional changes in community dynamics and ecosystemic processes, being an additional tool to assess biodiversity than species richness. Analysis of functional patterns in plant communities provides mechanistic insight into biodiversity alterations due to anthropogenic activity. Although studies have consi-dered of either anthropogenic management or nutrient availability on functional traits in temperate grasslands, studies combining effects of both drivers are scarce. Here, we assessed the impacts of management intensity (fertilization, mowing, grazing), nutrient stoichiometry (C, N, P, K), and vegetation composition on community-weighted means (CWMs) and functional diversity (Rao's ) from seven plant traits in 150 grasslands in three regions in Germany, using data of 6 years. Land use and nutrient stoichiometry accounted for larger proportions of model variance of CWM and Rao's than species richness and productivity. Grazing affected all analyzed trait groups; fertilization and mowing only impacted generative traits. Grazing was clearly associated with nutrient retention strategies, that is, investing in durable structures and production of fewer, less variable seed. Phenological variability was increased. Fertilization and mowing decreased seed number/mass variability, indicating competition-related effects. Impacts of nutrient stoichiometry on trait syndromes varied. Nutrient limitation (large N:P, C:N ratios) promoted species with conservative strategies, that is, investment in durable plant structures rather than fast growth, fewer seed, and delayed flowering onset. In contrast to seed mass, leaf-economics variability was reduced under P shortage. Species diversity was positively associated with the variability of generative traits. . Here, land use, nutrient availability, species richness, and plant functional strategies have been shown to interact complexly, driving community composition, and vegetation responses to management intensity. We suggest that deeper understanding of underlying mechanisms shaping community assembly and biodiversity will require analyzing all these parameters.

摘要

植物功能性状反映了个体和群落的生态策略。它们能够检测群落动态和生态系统过程中的方向性变化,是一种用于评估生物多样性的补充工具,而非仅依靠物种丰富度。对植物群落功能模式的分析为深入了解人为活动导致的生物多样性变化提供了机制性见解。尽管已有研究分别考虑了人为管理或养分有效性对温带草原功能性状的影响,但将这两种驱动因素的影响结合起来的研究却很匮乏。在此,我们利用德国三个地区150个草原6年的数据,评估了管理强度(施肥、割草、放牧)、养分化学计量(碳、氮、磷、钾)和植被组成对群落加权均值(CWMs)和功能多样性(Rao's )的影响,这些影响基于七种植物性状。土地利用和养分化学计量在CWM和Rao's 的模型方差中所占比例比物种丰富度和生产力更大。放牧影响了所有分析的性状组;施肥和割草仅影响生殖性状。放牧明显与养分保留策略相关,即投资于耐用结构并生产更少、变异性更小的种子。物候变异性增加。施肥和割草降低了种子数量/质量的变异性,表明存在与竞争相关的影响。养分化学计量对性状综合征的影响各不相同。养分限制(高氮磷比、高碳氮比)促进了具有保守策略的物种,即投资于耐用的植物结构而非快速生长、种子较少且开花起始延迟。与种子质量相反,在磷缺乏的情况下,叶经济变异性降低。物种多样性与生殖性状的变异性呈正相关。在此,已表明土地利用、养分有效性、物种丰富度和植物功能策略相互作用复杂,驱动着群落组成以及植被对管理强度的响应。我们建议,要更深入地理解塑造群落组装和生物多样性的潜在机制,需要分析所有这些参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/f18acd53b435/ECE3-8-601-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/fab02c45c325/ECE3-8-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/f0b5b73ce94c/ECE3-8-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/867ea988f572/ECE3-8-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/43a31e84079b/ECE3-8-601-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/f18acd53b435/ECE3-8-601-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/fab02c45c325/ECE3-8-601-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/f0b5b73ce94c/ECE3-8-601-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/867ea988f572/ECE3-8-601-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/43a31e84079b/ECE3-8-601-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee6/5756835/f18acd53b435/ECE3-8-601-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Nutrient stoichiometry and land use rather than species richness determine plant functional diversity.养分化学计量学和土地利用而非物种丰富度决定了植物功能多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 3;8(1):601-616. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3609. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships.利用植物功能性状解释多样性-生产力关系。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760. Epub 2012 May 18.
3
Land use and water availability drive community-level plant functional diversity of grasslands along a temperature gradient in the Swiss Alps.土地利用和水资源可利用性沿温度梯度驱动瑞士阿尔卑斯山草原的群落水平植物功能多样性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:142888. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142888. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Land use intensity, rather than plant species richness, affects the leaching risk of multiple nutrients from permanent grasslands.土地利用强度而非植物物种丰富度影响着永久性草地中多种养分的淋溶风险。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):2828-2840. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14123. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Morphological and physiological traits of dominant plant species in response to mowing in a temperate steppe.温带草原优势植物种对刈割的形态和生理响应特征。
Ecol Appl. 2023 Jul;33(5):e2863. doi: 10.1002/eap.2863. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Size and Reproductive Traits Rather than Leaf Economic Traits Explain Plant-Community Composition in Species-Rich Annual Vegetation along a Gradient of Land Use Intensity.在土地利用强度梯度上,物种丰富的一年生植被中,决定植物群落组成的是大小和繁殖性状而非叶片经济性状。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 29;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
7
Functional Trait Changes, Productivity Shifts and Vegetation Stability in Mountain Grasslands during a Short-Term Warming.短期变暖期间山地草原的功能性状变化、生产力转移与植被稳定性
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0141899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141899. eCollection 2015.
8
Direct and indirect effects of land-use intensification on ant communities in temperate grasslands.土地利用集约化对温带草原蚂蚁群落的直接和间接影响。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 5;9(7):4013-4024. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5030. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Above- and Belowground Plant Functional Composition Show Similar Changes During Temperate Forest Swamp Succession.温带森林沼泽演替过程中地上和地下植物功能组成呈现相似变化。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 28;12:658883. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658883. eCollection 2021.
10
Impact of land-use intensity and productivity on bryophyte diversity in agricultural grasslands.土地利用强度和生产力对农业草地苔藓植物多样性的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051520. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Plant species phenology differs between climate and land-use scenarios and relates to plant functional traits.植物物种的物候在不同气候和土地利用情景下存在差异,且与植物功能性状相关。
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 23;14(5):e11441. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11441. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Direct and Indirect Effects of Management Intensity and Environmental Factors on the Functional Diversity of Lichens in Central European Forests.管理强度和环境因素对中欧森林地衣功能多样性的直接和间接影响
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 23;9(2):463. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020463.
3
Eleven years' data of grassland management in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits.基于叶片功能性状的物种排名一致性。
New Phytol. 2001 Oct;152(1):69-83. doi: 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00239.x.
2
N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance.陆地植物中的氮磷比:变化及其功能意义
New Phytol. 2004 Nov;164(2):243-266. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x.
3
A comparative study of leaf nutrient concentrations in a regional herbaceous flora.区域草本植物群落叶片养分浓度的比较研究。
德国11年的草地管理数据。
Biodivers Data J. 2019 Sep 27;7:e36387. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e36387. eCollection 2019.
New Phytol. 1997 Aug;136(4):679-689. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00787.x.
4
Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients.草原生产力受多种养分限制。
Nat Plants. 2015 Jul 6;1:15080. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.80.
5
Trees increase their P:N ratio with size.树木的磷氮比随其大小而增加。
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015 Feb 1;24(2):147-156. doi: 10.1111/geb.12231.
6
Assembly processes under severe abiotic filtering: adaptation mechanisms of weed vegetation to the gradient of soil constraints.极端非生物筛选下的群落构建过程:杂草植被对土壤限制梯度的适应机制
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114290. eCollection 2014.
7
Low investment in sexual reproduction threatens plants adapted to phosphorus limitation.低水平的有性繁殖投入会威胁到适应磷限制的植物。
Nature. 2014 Jan 2;505(7481):82-6. doi: 10.1038/nature12733. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
8
Land use causes genetic differentiation of life-history traits in Bromus hordeaceus.土地利用导致冰草生活史特征的遗传分化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Mar;19(3):892-9. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12087. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area?与比叶面积相比,叶片干物质含量是更好的土壤肥力预测指标吗?
Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1337-45. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr225. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
10
Multivariate identification of plant functional response and effect traits in an agricultural landscape.农业景观中植物功能反应和效应特征的多元辨识。
Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1353-65. doi: 10.1890/10-1728.1.