Hosadurga Rajesh, Boloor Vinita Ashutosh, Rao Sudharshan N, MeghRani N
Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Melaka-Manipal Medical College, Melaka 75150, Malaysia.
Department of Periodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya University, Mangalore 575018, Karnataka, India.
J Tradit Complement Med. 2017 May 9;8(1):113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2017.04.005. eCollection 2018 Jan.
Plant based toothpastes have received great attention in reducing gingival inflammation. Studies show contrasting results regarding the effectiveness of these toothpastes. In the present study, the effectiveness of two herbal tooth paste formulations in the reduction of plaque and gingival inflammation was assessed. Nicotine content in the toothpastes was assessed using GCMS.
50 patients with established gingivitis were included in the study. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the test (Parodontax) or the control (Colgate herbal) group. There were 5 drop outs in the study in the control group after baseline examination. No prophylaxis was undertaken prior to commencement of the study, and no attempt was made to modify the participant's oral hygiene habits. A brief case history was recorded at baseline. The Turesky (1970) modification of the Quigley, Hein (1962) Plaque index (PI), the Loe and Silness (1963) Gingival Index (GI). Unstimulated salivary samples were collected at baseline and 30th day and the pH was measured using a salivary pH meter (CL-51B; Systronics New Delhi, India).Comparisons (intergroup and intragroup) were analysed by the -test. Groups were also compared regarding age by means of test, and association between group and sex was verified by means of the chi-square test. All statistical tests employed a level of significance of α = 0.05. There were reports of presence of nicotine and its derivatives in herbal toothpaste after the study was nearing completion. Hence we assessed for the presence of nicotine in both the toothpaste using the methods described by Aggarwal .
When the two groups (test and control groups) were evaluated, after 30 days, the test group presented an average 21.08% reduction in plaque and the control group showed 31.85% reduction in plaque scores. The mean reduction in gingival index (GI) scores was 25.92% and 19.14% in the test and control groups respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in GI, PI and salivary pH levels. There was no evidence of nicotine or related compounds in both the tooth paste.
Both herbal based dentifrices reduce plaque levels and gingival inflammation. But, it did not alter the pH of the saliva. However, there were no additional benefits of the Parodontax toothpaste over Colgate Herbal toothpaste. There was no evidence of nicotine or related compounds in both herbal toothpaste.
植物性牙膏在减轻牙龈炎症方面受到了广泛关注。关于这些牙膏的有效性,研究结果存在差异。在本研究中,评估了两种草本牙膏配方在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的有效性。使用气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(GCMS)评估牙膏中的尼古丁含量。
50名已确诊为牙龈炎的患者纳入本研究。受试者被随机分为试验组(Parodontax)或对照组(高露洁草本牙膏)。对照组在基线检查后有5名受试者退出研究。在研究开始前未进行预防性治疗,也未尝试改变参与者的口腔卫生习惯。在基线时记录简要的病例史。采用对Quigley - Hein(1962年)菌斑指数(PI)的Turesky(1970年)改良版,以及Loe和Silness(1963年)牙龈指数(GI)。在基线和第30天收集非刺激性唾液样本,使用唾液pH计(CL - 51B;印度新德里Systronics公司)测量pH值。(组间和组内)比较采用t检验进行分析。通过t检验比较两组的年龄,通过卡方检验验证组与性别的相关性。所有统计检验的显著性水平为α = 0.05。在研究接近完成时,有报道称草本牙膏中存在尼古丁及其衍生物。因此,我们采用Aggarwal描述的方法评估了两种牙膏中尼古丁的存在情况。
在对两组(试验组和对照组)进行评估时,30天后,试验组的菌斑平均减少了21.08%,对照组的菌斑评分减少了31.85%。试验组和对照组牙龈指数(GI)评分的平均降低分别为25.92%和19.14%。两组在GI、PI和唾液pH水平方面无显著差异。两种牙膏中均未发现尼古丁或相关化合物的证据。
两种草本牙膏均能降低牙菌斑水平和减轻牙龈炎症。但是,它并未改变唾液的pH值。然而,与高露洁草本牙膏相比,Parodontax牙膏并无额外益处。两种草本牙膏中均未发现尼古丁或相关化合物的证据。