Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):16508-16521. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1162-0. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Toxicological studies use "specialty chemicals" and, thus, should assess and report both identity and degree of purity (homogeneity) of the chemicals (or toxicants) under investigation to ensure that other scientists can replicate experimental results. Although detailed reporting criteria for the synthesis and characterization of organic compounds have been established by organic chemistry journals, such criteria are inconsistently applied to the chemicals used in toxicological studies. Biologically active trace impurities may lead to incorrect conclusions about the chemical entity responsible for a biological response, which in turn may confound risk assessment. Based on our experience with the synthesis of PCBs and their metabolites, we herein propose guidelines for the "authentication" of synthetic PCBs and, by extension, other organic toxicants, and provide a checklist for documenting the authentication of toxicants reported in the peer-reviewed literature. The objective is to expand guidelines proposed for different types of biomedical and preclinical studies to include a thorough authentication of specialty chemicals, such as PCBs and their derivatives, with the goal of ensuring transparent and open reporting of scientific results in toxicology and the environmental health sciences.
毒理学研究使用“特种化学品”,因此,应评估和报告正在研究的化学品(或毒物)的身份和纯度(均一性),以确保其他科学家能够复制实验结果。虽然有机化学期刊已经为有机化合物的合成和表征制定了详细的报告标准,但这些标准在毒理学研究中使用的化学品上应用不一致。生物活性痕量杂质可能导致对负责生物反应的化学实体的错误结论,进而可能使风险评估复杂化。基于我们在多氯联苯及其代谢物合成方面的经验,我们在此提出了合成多氯联苯及其衍生物的“鉴定”指南,并通过扩展为其他有机毒物提供了一份清单,用于记录同行评议文献中报告的毒物的鉴定情况。目的是将为不同类型的生物医学和临床前研究提出的指南扩展到包括对特种化学品(如多氯联苯及其衍生物)的彻底鉴定,以确保毒理学和环境健康科学领域科学结果的透明和公开报告。