Suppr超能文献

体内模型中肥厚性瘢痕形成的比较评估。

Comparative evaluations of hypertrophic scar formation in in vivo models.

作者信息

Kim Myeongjin, Kim Hyejin, Kang Hyun Wook

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.

Interdisciplinary Program of Marine-Bio, Electrical & Mechanical Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan 11. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22783.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypertrophic scar (HTS) results from a connective tissue reaction to trauma, inflammation, surgery, or burn on skin. In spite of various techniques for wound generation, the degree of scar in animal models after healing is still unpredictable and less reproducible. The objective of the current study was to identify the appropriate method to create the maximal HTS tissue in a reliable manner by comparing three different methods in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 27 ICR mice were tested for the in vivo evaluations. Three different methods were applied to develop wounds on the back of each mice for quantitative evaluations on collagen formation: Group 1 (thermal burn), Group 2 (chemical burn), and Group 3 (physical punch). After injury, each lesion was photographed to examine physical variations in the wound areas. Histological analysis was conducted on days 0, 7, and 28 to assess the extent of the injury in the tissue and to quantitatively compare the amount of collagen formation after wound healing.

RESULTS

Compared with Groups 1 and 3, Group 2 demonstrated the largest wound area that gradually decreased with healing time. However, the minimal axial damage (along tissue depth) occurred to Group 2 at day 0 (183.7 ± 28.9, 38.1 ± 9.2, and 296.0 ± 81.7 µm for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). After 28 days, all the groups showed the complete healing and accompanied a significant increase in the number of fibroblast and collagen generation with well-oriented and denser collagen fibers, in comparison with normal skin. Group 2 yielded twice thicker skin (both epidermis and dermis) than the other groups (970.8 ± 108.8 µm for Group 2 vs. 381.5 ± 30.8 µm for Group 1 and 442.9 ± 56.3 µm for Group 3; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed chemical burn can be the optimal method to create collagenous scar tissue in the mouse model. Further in vivo investigations with rat models will be performed to validate the current technique for laser scar treatment in terms of reliability and immunohistochemical responses. Lasers Surg. Med. 9999:XX-XX, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景与目的

肥厚性瘢痕(HTS)是皮肤对创伤、炎症、手术或烧伤产生的结缔组织反应。尽管有多种伤口生成技术,但动物模型愈合后的瘢痕程度仍不可预测且重复性较差。本研究的目的是通过比较三种不同的体内方法,确定一种可靠地创建最大程度肥厚性瘢痕组织的合适方法。

材料与方法

选用27只ICR小鼠进行体内评估。对每只小鼠背部采用三种不同方法造成伤口,以对胶原蛋白形成进行定量评估:第1组(热烧伤)、第2组(化学烧伤)和第3组(物理打孔)。受伤后,对每个损伤部位拍照,以检查伤口区域的物理变化。在第0天、第7天和第28天进行组织学分析,以评估组织损伤程度,并定量比较伤口愈合后胶原蛋白的形成量。

结果

与第1组和第3组相比,第2组的伤口面积最大,且随愈合时间逐渐减小。然而,在第0天,第2组的轴向损伤最小(第1组、第2组和第3组分别为183.7±28.9、38.1±9.2和296.0±81.7μm)。28天后,所有组均显示完全愈合,与正常皮肤相比,成纤维细胞数量显著增加,胶原蛋白生成增加,胶原纤维排列良好且更致密。第2组的皮肤(包括表皮和真皮)厚度是其他组的两倍(第2组为970.8±108.8μm,第1组为381.5±30.8μm,第3组为442.9±56.3μm;P<0.001)。

结论

所提出的化学烧伤方法可能是在小鼠模型中创建胶原性瘢痕组织的最佳方法。将进一步对大鼠模型进行体内研究,以验证当前激光瘢痕治疗技术在可靠性和免疫组化反应方面的效果。《激光外科与医学》9999:XX - XX,2017。©2017威利期刊公司

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验