Department of Neurointerventional Radiology, Institute of Neurosciences, Medanta Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Radiology, Aster Medcity, Cochin, Kerala, India.
Neurol India. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):83-89. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.222811.
Endovascular treatment of vertebral intradural dissecting aneurysms is complex and requires different strategies for each case. The current study aims to classify these aneurysms for an easy selection of optimal strategies for endovascular therapy.
This study is a retrospective evaluation of 10 patients harbouring a vertebral intradural dissecting aneurysm (including 6 female and 4 male patients). The clinical, procedural, and angiographic data were evaluated.
Nine patients presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage and 1 with acute-onset headache. The aneurysms were classified into two types, depending on the developmental state of the contralateral vertebral artery: Dominant (A) and hypoplastic (B). Type A (n = 7) group was further divided into three subtypes on the basis of location of the aneurysm in relation to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA): aneurysm proximal to the PICA, Type I (n = 3); involving the PICA, Type II (n = 2); and, distal to the PICA, Type III (n = 2). Internal trapping was done for 4 patients in this group, 2 patients with aneurysm involving the PICA underwent proximal occlusion and 1 patient underwent stent-assisted coiling since he refused to undergo vertebral artery sacrifice. B Type patients (n = 3) were treated with reconstructive endovascular management. No symptomatic complication was seen in the patients with trapping. Antiplatelet medication-related complication was seen in 2 patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling. Clinical outcome at the time of discharge was good [modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2] in 8 and poor (mRs >2) in 2 patients. At follow-up visit, one patient had developed severe cognitive impairment but was independent in activities of daily living.
The classification of vertebral artery aneurysms based on their location and on the status of the contralateral vertebral artery appears to be an effective method for the selection of safe and appropriate endovascular therapy.
治疗硬脊膜内的椎动脉夹层动脉瘤较为复杂,需要根据具体情况选择不同的策略。本研究旨在对这些动脉瘤进行分类,以便于选择最佳的血管内治疗策略。
这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入 10 例硬脊膜内的椎动脉夹层动脉瘤患者(包括 6 例女性和 4 例男性)。评估了患者的临床、手术和血管造影数据。
9 例患者表现为急性蛛网膜下腔出血,1 例患者表现为急性头痛。根据对侧椎动脉的发育状态,将动脉瘤分为两型:优势型(A 型)和发育不良型(B 型)。A 型(n=7)组根据动脉瘤与小脑后下动脉(PICA)的位置关系进一步分为 3 个亚型:位于 PICA 近端,I 型(n=3);累及 PICA,II 型(n=2);位于 PICA 远端,III 型(n=2)。该组 4 例患者行血管内内漏,2 例累及 PICA 的患者行近端闭塞,1 例患者因拒绝椎动脉结扎而行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞。B 型患者(n=3)行血管重建治疗。内漏组无症状并发症,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞组 2 例患者出现抗血小板药物相关并发症。出院时临床预后良好(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)8 例,预后不良(改良 Rankin 量表评分>2)2 例。随访时,1 例患者出现严重认知障碍,但日常生活活动能力独立。
根据动脉瘤的位置和对侧椎动脉的状态对椎动脉动脉瘤进行分类,似乎是选择安全、合适的血管内治疗策略的有效方法。