• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模型比较氟西汀治疗老年和非老年重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效。

Model-based comparing efficacy of fluoxetine between elderly and non-elderly participants with major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Center for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.

Center for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.103. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.103
PMID:29324370
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high heterogeneity was existed among the studies of the elderly participants with major depressive disorder (MDD), which may lead to incorrect conclusions in the previous meta-analysis. This study used model based meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of fluoxetine between the elderly and non-elderly participants with MDD and to explain the heterogeneity among the studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the public databases, involving utilization of fluoxetine for treating MDD in the acute-phase. The time-efficacy model was established based on the changes of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score compared to baseline level. The efficacy features and related factors of fluoxetine in the elderly participants were investigated by comparing with the non-elderly population.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies encompassing 4058 participants were included in the analysis. We found the trial design of placebo controlled vs. comparator controlled was a significant impact factor for the efficacy of fluoxetine. The typical decrease rate of HDRS score in the elderly participants was strikingly lower than that of the non-elderly participants at week 8, with 39.9% vs. 49.1% in the placebo controlled trial and 46.5% vs. 57.2% in the comparator controlled trial.

LIMITATION

The efficacy of other antidepressants except fluoxetine in the elderly participants need to be explored in the future study.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of fluoxetine in the elderly participants was lower than that of the non-elderly participants. The heterogeneity of the trial design should be distinguished when comparing the efficacy of antidepressants between the elderly and non-elderly MDD participants.

摘要

背景

老年重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的研究存在很大的异质性,这可能导致之前的荟萃分析得出错误的结论。本研究采用基于模型的荟萃分析比较氟西汀治疗老年和非老年 MDD 患者的疗效,并解释研究之间的异质性。

方法

在公共数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,涉及氟西汀在急性期治疗 MDD 的应用。根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)评分与基线水平的变化建立时间疗效模型。通过与非老年人群比较,研究氟西汀在老年患者中的疗效特征和相关因素。

结果

纳入分析的 61 项研究共包含 4058 名患者。我们发现,安慰剂对照与对照药物比较的试验设计是氟西汀疗效的一个显著影响因素。在第 8 周,安慰剂对照试验中氟西汀治疗后 HDRS 评分的典型下降率显著低于非老年组,为 39.9%比 49.1%;在对照药物比较试验中为 46.5%比 57.2%。

局限性

未来需要研究其他抗抑郁药(除氟西汀外)在老年患者中的疗效。

结论

氟西汀在老年患者中的疗效低于非老年患者。在比较老年和非老年 MDD 患者抗抑郁药的疗效时,应区分试验设计的异质性。

相似文献

1
Model-based comparing efficacy of fluoxetine between elderly and non-elderly participants with major depressive disorder.基于模型比较氟西汀治疗老年和非老年重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.103. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
2
Efficacy of Bright Light Treatment, Fluoxetine, and the Combination in Patients With Nonseasonal Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.明亮光照治疗、氟西汀及二者联合治疗非季节性重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;73(1):56-63. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2235.
3
Sex- and age-related differences in major depressive disorder with comorbid anxiety treated with fluoxetine.使用氟西汀治疗的伴有焦虑症的重度抑郁症中的性别和年龄差异。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2004 Jul;7(3):167-71. doi: 10.1007/s00737-004-0051-y. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
4
Duloxetine compared with fluoxetine and venlafaxine: use of meta-regression analysis for indirect comparisons.度洛西汀与氟西汀和文拉法辛的比较:使用Meta回归分析进行间接比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Jul 24;6:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-30.
5
Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination for the treatment of mixed depression in bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis.奥氮平/氟西汀联合治疗双相I型障碍混合性抑郁:一项事后分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1424-31. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04772gre.
6
Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.探索性分析美国食品和药物管理局支持新药申请的主要抑郁症试验的疗效数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):464-72. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06191.
7
Fluoxetine treatment of depressed patients with comorbid anxiety disorders.用氟西汀治疗伴有共病焦虑症的抑郁症患者。
J Psychopharmacol. 2002 Sep;16(3):215-9. doi: 10.1177/026988110201600304.
8
Efficacy of antidepressants for late-life depression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of placebo-controlled randomized trials.抗抑郁药治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效:安慰剂对照随机试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;72(12):1660-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06531.
9
Hopelessness as a predictor of non-response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.绝望作为重度抑郁症患者对氟西汀无反应的预测指标。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Mar;19(1):5-8. doi: 10.1080/10401230601163451.
10
Double-blind fluoxetine trial in comorbid MDD-CUD youth and young adults.双盲氟西汀治疗共病 MDD-CUD 青少年和年轻成年人的试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Nov 1;112(1-2):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of Model-Based Meta-Analysis in Drug Development.基于模型的荟萃分析在药物研发中的应用。
Pharm Res. 2022 Aug;39(8):1761-1777. doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03201-5. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Comparative analysis of PIM criteria and drug labels in the elderly.老年人 PIM 标准与药品标签的对比分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;78(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03262-2. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
Analysis of Time Course and Dose Effect From Metformin on Body Mass Index in Children and Adolescents.二甲双胍对儿童和青少年体重指数的时间进程及剂量效应分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 26;12:611480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.611480. eCollection 2021.