• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初产妇异常胎盘前置的病因:与妇科手术相关的风险。

Antecedents of Abnormally Invasive Placenta in Primiparous Women: Risk Associated With Gynecologic Procedures.

机构信息

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, New South Wales, the Biostatistics Training Program, New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, New South Wales, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales, the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, and the Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):227-233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002434.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002434
PMID:29324602
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between prior invasive gynecologic procedures and the risk of subsequent abnormally invasive placenta (ie, placenta accreta, increta, and percreta).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based data linkage study including all primiparous women who delivered in New South Wales, Australia, between 2003 and 2012. Data were obtained from linked birth and hospital admissions with a minimum lookback period of 2 years. Prior procedures invasive of the uterus were considered including gynecologic laparoscopy with instrumentation of the uterus; hysteroscopy, including operative hysteroscopy; curettage, including suction curettage and surgical termination; and endometrial ablation. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the association between the number of prior gynecologic procedures and risk of abnormally invasive placenta.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifty-four cases of abnormally invasive placenta were identified among 380,775 deliveries included in the study (22.4/10,000). In total, 33,296 primiparous women had at least one prior procedure (8.7%). Among women with abnormally invasive placenta, 152 (17.8%) had undergone at least one procedure compared with 33,144 (8.7%) among women without abnormally invasive placenta (P<.01). After adjustment, the relative risk was 1.5 for one procedure (99% CI 1.1-1.9), 2.7 for two procedures (99% CI 1.7-4.4), and 5.1 for three or more procedures (99% CI 2.7-9.6). Abnormally invasive placenta was also positively associated with maternal age, socioeconomic advantage, mother being Australia-born, placenta previa, hypertension, multiple births, use of assisted reproductive technology, and female fetal sex.

CONCLUSION

Women with a history of prior invasive gynecologic procedures were more likely to develop abnormally invasive placenta. These insights may be used to inform management of pregnancies in women with a history of gynecologic procedures.

摘要

目的

评估既往妇科侵入性操作与异常侵袭性胎盘(即胎盘植入、胎盘穿透和胎盘穿透)风险之间的关联。

方法

我们进行了一项基于人群的数据关联研究,纳入了 2003 年至 2012 年期间在澳大利亚新南威尔士州分娩的所有初产妇。数据来自与至少 2 年回溯期的关联分娩和住院记录。既往子宫内侵入性操作包括妇科腹腔镜检查伴子宫器械操作、宫腔镜检查(包括手术性宫腔镜检查)、刮宫术(包括吸刮术和手术性终止妊娠)和子宫内膜消融术。采用校正泊松回归分析确定既往妇科操作次数与异常侵袭性胎盘风险之间的关系。

结果

研究共纳入 380775 例分娩病例,其中 854 例诊断为异常侵袭性胎盘(22.4/10000)。共有 33296 例初产妇至少进行过一次操作(8.7%)。在异常侵袭性胎盘患者中,152 例(17.8%)至少进行过一次操作,而在无异常侵袭性胎盘患者中,33144 例(8.7%)至少进行过一次操作(P<.01)。校正后,一次操作的相对风险为 1.5(99%可信区间 1.1-1.9),两次操作的相对风险为 2.7(99%可信区间 1.7-4.4),三次或更多次操作的相对风险为 5.1(99%可信区间 2.7-9.6)。异常侵袭性胎盘也与产妇年龄、社会经济优势、母亲为澳大利亚出生、前置胎盘、高血压、多胎妊娠、辅助生殖技术应用和女性胎儿性别呈正相关。

结论

既往有妇科侵入性操作史的妇女发生异常侵袭性胎盘的风险更高。这些发现可用于指导有妇科操作史的妇女妊娠管理。

相似文献

1
Antecedents of Abnormally Invasive Placenta in Primiparous Women: Risk Associated With Gynecologic Procedures.初产妇异常胎盘前置的病因:与妇科手术相关的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):227-233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002434.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following abnormally invasive placenta: a population-based record linkage study.异常侵入性胎盘后的母婴结局:一项基于人群的记录链接研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1373-1381. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13201. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Maternal outcome after conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta.异常侵入性胎盘保守治疗后的母儿结局
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.016.
4
The Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Epidemiology and Risk Factors.胎盘植入谱系疾病:流行病学与危险因素
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):733-742. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000391.
5
Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta.前置胎盘-胎盘植入的临床危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70463-0.
6
The relation between maternal obesity and placenta accreta spectrum: A multinational database study.母亲肥胖与胎盘植入谱系疾病的关系:一项多国数据库研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100 Suppl 1:50-57. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14075.
7
Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis.异常侵入性胎盘的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Feb;33(3):471-481. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1493453. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
8
Clinical and Ultrasound Predictors of Placenta Accreta in Pregnant Women with Antepartum Diagnosis of Placenta Previa: A Multicenter Study.前置胎盘孕妇产前诊断胎盘植入的临床及超声预测因素:一项多中心研究
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(3):242-247. doi: 10.1159/000494492. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Placenta Accreta Spectrum Without Placenta Previa.胎盘植入谱系疾病,不伴有前置胎盘。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):458-465. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003970.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the depth of invasion in women at risk of abnormally invasive placenta: A prospective longitudinal study.超声检测高危异常胎盘侵袭深度的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Oct;97(10):1219-1227. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13389. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Placenta accreta spectrum.胎盘植入谱系疾病
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00624-3.
2
High Risk Factors for Placenta Accreta Other than Pregnancy and Their Impact on Patient Prognosis.除妊娠外的胎盘植入高危因素及其对患者预后的影响。
Matern Fetal Med. 2023 Jul;5(3):137-143. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000183. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder After Prior Non-Cesarean Delivery Uterine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.既往非剖宫产子宫手术后发生胎盘植入谱系障碍的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 1;145(6):628-638. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005824. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Increased Levels of hsa-miR-199a-3p and hsa-miR-382-5p in Maternal and Neonatal Blood Plasma in the Case of Placenta Accreta Spectrum.胎盘植入谱系病例中母血和新生儿血浆中hsa-miR-199a-3p和hsa-miR-382-5p水平升高
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 11;25(24):13309. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413309.
5
PAS or Not PAS? The Sonographic Assessment of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders and the Clinical Validation of a New Diagnostic and Prognostic Scoring System.是胎盘植入还是非胎盘植入?胎盘植入谱系疾病的超声评估及一种新的诊断和预后评分系统的临床验证
J Imaging. 2024 Dec 10;10(12):315. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10120315.
6
Evaluation of the Management and Outcome of Patients with Retained Products of Conception after Gestational Week 23+0: A Retrospective Cohort Study.孕23 + 0周后稽留流产患者的管理及结局评估:一项回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4439. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154439.
7
Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS): Diagnosis, Clinical Presentation, Therapeutic Approaches, and Clinical Outcomes.胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS):诊断、临床表现、治疗方法和临床结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 20;60(7):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071180.
8
Placental T2WI MRI-based radiomics-clinical nomogram predicts suspicious placenta accreta spectrum in patients with placenta previa.基于胎盘 T2WI MRI 的放射组学-临床列线图预测前置胎盘患者胎盘植入综合征的可疑性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01328-y.
9
Validity of ICD-10 diagnosis codes for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.ICD-10 诊断编码用于胎盘植入谱系疾病的有效性。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;38(5):435-439. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13076. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta- a matched cohort study.胎盘植入合并妊娠的新生儿结局:一项匹配队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):269-275. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07353-6. Epub 2024 Jan 23.