• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在前臂上放置电极以选择性刺激手指伸展/屈曲。

Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion.

作者信息

Bao Xueliang, Zhou Yuxuan, Wang Yunlong, Zhang Jianjun, Lü Xiaoying, Wang Zhigong

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.

Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190936. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190936
PMID:29324829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5764314/
Abstract

It is still challenging to achieve a complex grasp or fine finger control by using surface functional electrical stimulation (FES), which usually requires a precise electrode configuration under laboratory or clinical settings. The goals of this study are as follows: 1) to study the possibility of selectively activating individual fingers; 2) to investigate whether the current activation threshold and selective range of individual fingers are affected by two factors: changes in the electrode position and forearm rotation (pronation, neutral and supination); and 3) to explore a theoretical model for guidance of the electrode placement used for selective activation of individual fingers. A coordinate system with more than 400 grid points was established over the forearm skin surface. A searching procedure was used to traverse all grid points to identify the stimulation points for finger extension/flexion by applying monophasic stimulation pulses. Some of the stimulation points for finger extension and flexion were selected and tested in their respective two different forearm postures according to the number and the type of the activated fingers and the strength of finger action response to the electrical stimulation at the stimulation point. The activation thresholds and current ranges of the selectively activated finger at each stimulation point were determined by visual analysis. The stimulation points were divided into three groups ("Low", "Medium" and "High") according to the thresholds of the 1st activated fingers. The angles produced by the selectively activated finger within selective current ranges were measured and analyzed. Selective stimulation of extension/flexion is possible for most fingers. Small changes in electrode position and forearm rotation have no significant effect on the threshold amplitude and the current range for the selective activation of most fingers (p > 0.05). The current range is the largest (more than 2 mA) for selective activation of the thumb, followed by those for the index, ring, middle and little fingers. The stimulation points in the "Low" group for all five fingers lead to noticeable finger angles at low current intensity, especially for the index, middle, and ring fingers. The slopes of the finger angle variation in the "Low" group for digits 2~4 are inversely proportional to the current intensity, whereas the slopes of the finger angle variation in other groups and in all groups for the thumb and little finger are proportional to the current intensity. It is possible to selectively activate the extension/flexion of most fingers by stimulating the forearm muscles. The physiological characteristics of each finger should be considered when placing the negative electrode for selective stimulation of individual fingers. The electrode placement used for the selective activation of individual fingers should not be confined to the location with the lowest activation threshold.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/70f6f981864e/pone.0190936.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/fdbb923ad414/pone.0190936.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/5a2a2303b7c3/pone.0190936.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/2c04fa58cd3e/pone.0190936.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/a60f9162eeab/pone.0190936.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/c27a14846952/pone.0190936.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/c031880cc7cd/pone.0190936.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/fd8baa4dc004/pone.0190936.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/0e53ecf3fde2/pone.0190936.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/70f6f981864e/pone.0190936.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/fdbb923ad414/pone.0190936.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/5a2a2303b7c3/pone.0190936.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/2c04fa58cd3e/pone.0190936.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/a60f9162eeab/pone.0190936.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/c27a14846952/pone.0190936.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/c031880cc7cd/pone.0190936.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/fd8baa4dc004/pone.0190936.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/0e53ecf3fde2/pone.0190936.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c838/5764314/70f6f981864e/pone.0190936.g009.jpg
摘要

通过使用表面功能性电刺激(FES)来实现复杂抓握或精细手指控制仍然具有挑战性,这通常需要在实验室或临床环境下进行精确的电极配置。本研究的目标如下:1)研究选择性激活单个手指的可能性;2)研究单个手指当前的激活阈值和选择范围是否受两个因素影响:电极位置的变化和前臂旋转(旋前、中立和旋后);3)探索一个理论模型,以指导用于选择性激活单个手指的电极放置。在前臂皮肤表面建立了一个具有400多个网格点的坐标系。使用搜索程序遍历所有网格点,通过施加单相刺激脉冲来识别手指伸展/屈曲的刺激点。根据激活手指的数量和类型以及刺激点处手指动作对电刺激的反应强度,选择一些手指伸展和屈曲的刺激点,并在其各自的两种不同前臂姿势下进行测试。通过视觉分析确定每个刺激点处选择性激活手指的激活阈值和电流范围。根据第一个激活手指的阈值,将刺激点分为三组(“低”、“中”和“高”)。测量并分析在选择性电流范围内选择性激活手指产生的角度。大多数手指都可以实现伸展/屈曲的选择性刺激。电极位置和前臂旋转的微小变化对大多数手指选择性激活的阈值幅度和电流范围没有显著影响(p>0.05)。选择性激活拇指的电流范围最大(超过2 mA),其次是食指、无名指、中指和小指。所有五个手指“低”组中的刺激点在低电流强度下会导致明显的手指角度,特别是食指、中指和无名指。2至4指“低”组中手指角度变化的斜率与电流强度成反比,而其他组以及拇指和小指所有组中手指角度变化的斜率与电流强度成正比。通过刺激前臂肌肉可以选择性地激活大多数手指的伸展/屈曲。在放置负极以选择性刺激单个手指时,应考虑每个手指的生理特征。用于选择性激活单个手指的电极放置不应局限于激活阈值最低的位置。

相似文献

1
Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion.在前臂上放置电极以选择性刺激手指伸展/屈曲。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190936. eCollection 2018.
2
Selectivity and resolution of surface electrical stimulation for grasp and release.表面电刺激对抓握和释放的选择性和分辨率。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Jan;20(1):94-101. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2178749. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Automatic determination of the optimal shape of a surface electrode: selective stimulation.表面电极最佳形状的自动确定:选择性刺激
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Mar 30;178(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
4
Hand digit control in children: age-related changes in hand digit force interactions during maximum flexion and extension force production tasks.儿童手部手指控制:最大屈伸力产生任务中手部手指力量相互作用的年龄相关变化
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jan;176(2):374-86. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0629-x.
5
Quantifying forearm muscle activity during wrist and finger movements by means of multi-channel electromyography.通过多通道肌电图量化手腕和手指运动期间的前臂肌肉活动。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e109943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109943. eCollection 2014.
6
Assessment of finger forces and wrist torques for functional grasp using new multichannel textile neuroprostheses.使用新型多通道纺织神经假体评估功能性抓握时的手指力量和手腕扭矩。
Artif Organs. 2008 Aug;32(8):634-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00614.x.
7
Individual finger classification from surface EMG: Influence of electrode set.基于表面肌电图的单指分类:电极组的影响。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:7284-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320073.
8
Flexion and extension angles of resting fingers and wrist.休息时手指和手腕的弯曲和伸展角度。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):91-101. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077038.
9
Distinct neural control of intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the hand during single finger pressing.单指按压过程中手部内在肌和外在肌的不同神经控制。
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Jun;59:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 May 5.
10
Multi-pad electrode for effective grasping: design.多电极垫以有效抓取:设计。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Jul;21(4):648-54. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2239662. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Electro-tactile modulation of muscle activation and intermuscular coordination in the human upper extremity.人体上肢肌肉激活和肌肉间协调性的电触觉调制
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86342-y.
2
The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on intentional binding and explicit sense of agency.电肌肉刺激对意向绑定和明确的代理感的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 19;12:e17977. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17977. eCollection 2024.
3
Simulation of FES on the forearm with muscle-specific activation resolution.具有肌肉特异性激活分辨率的前臂功能性电刺激模拟。

本文引用的文献

1
A wearable multi-pad electrode prototype for selective functional electrical stimulation of upper extremities.一种用于上肢选择性功能性电刺激的可穿戴多极板电极原型。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:714-717. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036924.
2
A decision support system for electrode shaping in multi-pad FES foot drop correction.用于多电极表面电刺激足下垂矫正中电极塑形的决策支持系统。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jul 3;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0275-5.
3
Advances in selective activation of muscles for non-invasive motor neuroprostheses.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 27;12:1384617. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1384617. eCollection 2024.
4
A portable, programmable, multichannel stimulator with high compliance voltage for noninvasive neural stimulation of motor and sensory nerves in humans.一种便携式、可编程、多通道刺激器,具有高顺应电压,可用于对人类运动和感觉神经进行非侵入性神经刺激。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30545-8.
5
Evaluation of Electric Muscle Stimulation Method for Haptic Augmented Reality.电肌肉刺激法在力觉增强现实中的评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 5;23(4):1796. doi: 10.3390/s23041796.
6
STIMGRASP: A Home-Based Functional Electrical Stimulator for Grasp Restoration in Daily Activities.STIMGRASP:一种用于日常活动中抓握功能恢复的家庭用功能性电刺激器。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;23(1):10. doi: 10.3390/s23010010.
7
Closed-loop neuromuscular electrical stimulation using feedforward-feedback control and textile electrodes to regulate grasp force in quadriplegia.使用前馈-反馈控制和纺织电极的闭环神经肌肉电刺激来调节四肢瘫痪患者的抓握力。
Bioelectron Med. 2019 Nov 1;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s42234-019-0034-y. eCollection 2019.
用于非侵入性运动神经假体的肌肉选择性激活研究进展。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jun 13;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0165-2.
4
Multi-contact functional electrical stimulation for hand opening: electrophysiologically driven identification of the optimal stimulation site.用于手部张开的多触点功能性电刺激:基于电生理学驱动确定最佳刺激部位
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Mar 8;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0129-6.
5
A frequency and pulse-width co-modulation strategy for transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation based on sEMG time-domain features.一种基于表面肌电图时域特征的经皮神经肌肉电刺激频率与脉宽共调制策略。
J Neural Eng. 2016 Feb;13(1):016004. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016004. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?能否改进神经肌肉电刺激的使用以优化股四头肌强化?
Sports Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;8(1):79-85. doi: 10.1177/1941738115618174.
7
A novel functional electrical stimulation-control system for restoring motor function of post-stroke hemiplegic patients.一种用于恢复中风后偏瘫患者运动功能的新型功能性电刺激控制系统。
Neural Regen Res. 2014 Dec 1;9(23):2102-10. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.147938.
8
Motor point map of upper body muscles.上身肌肉运动点图。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Aug;114(8):1605-17. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2892-z. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Muscle motor point identification is essential for optimizing neuromuscular electrical stimulation use.肌肉运动点识别对于优化神经肌肉电刺激的使用至关重要。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Feb 25;11:17. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-17.
10
The effect of stroke on motor selectivity for force control in single- and multi-finger force production tasks.中风对单指和多指力量产生任务中力量控制的运动选择性的影响。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(3):429-35. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141050.