Suppr超能文献

一项针对荷兰蛋鸡养殖场的横断面研究,旨在调查不同衣原体种类的流行情况及潜在风险因素。

A cross sectional study on Dutch layer farms to investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors for different Chlamydia species.

作者信息

Heijne Marloes, van der Goot Jeanet A, Fijten Helmi, van der Giessen Joke W, Kuijt Eric, Maassen Catharina B M, van Roon Annika, Wit Ben, Koets Ad P, Roest Hendrik I J

机构信息

Department of Bacteriology and Epidemiology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.

Department of Infection Biology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190774. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In poultry several Chlamydia species have been detected, but Chlamydia psittaci and Chlamydia gallinacea appear to be most prevalent and important. Chlamydia psittaci is a well-known zoonosis and is considered to be a pathogen of poultry. Chlamydia gallinacea has been described more recently. Its avian pathogenicity and zoonotic potential have to be further elucidated. Within the Netherlands no data were available on the presence of Chlamydia on poultry farms. As part of a surveillance programme for zoonotic pathogens in farm animals, we investigated pooled faecal samples from 151 randomly selected layer farms. On a voluntary base, 69 farmers, family members or farm workers from these 151 farms submitted a throat swab. All samples were tested with a generic 23S Chlamydiaceae PCR followed by a species specific PCR for C. avium, C. gallinacea and C. psittaci. C. avium and psittaci DNA was not detected at any of the farms. At 71 farms the positive result could be confirmed as C. gallinacea. Variables significantly associated with the presence of C. gallinacea in a final multivariable model were 'age of hens,' 'use of bedding material' and 'the presence of horses.' The presence of C. gallinacea was associated with neither clinical signs, varying from respiratory symptoms, nasal and ocular discharges to diarrhoea, nor with a higher mortality rate the day before the visit. All throat swabs from farmers, family members or farm workers tested negative for Chlamydia DNA, giving no further indication for possible bird-to-human (or human-to-bird) transmission.

摘要

在家禽中已检测到几种衣原体,但鹦鹉热衣原体和鸡衣原体似乎最为普遍且重要。鹦鹉热衣原体是一种著名的人畜共患病原体,被认为是家禽的病原体。鸡衣原体是最近才被描述的。其对禽类的致病性和人畜共患潜力还有待进一步阐明。在荷兰,没有关于家禽养殖场衣原体存在情况的数据。作为农场动物人畜共患病原体监测计划的一部分,我们调查了从151个随机选择的蛋鸡养殖场采集的粪便混合样本。在自愿的基础上,来自这151个养殖场的69名农民、家庭成员或农场工人提交了咽喉拭子。所有样本首先用通用的23S衣原体PCR进行检测,随后用针对禽衣原体、鸡衣原体和鹦鹉热衣原体的种特异性PCR进行检测。在任何养殖场均未检测到禽衣原体和鹦鹉热衣原体DNA。在71个养殖场,阳性结果可确认为鸡衣原体。在最终的多变量模型中,与鸡衣原体存在显著相关的变量是“母鸡年龄”、“垫料使用情况”和“马匹的存在”。鸡衣原体的存在既与临床症状无关,临床症状从呼吸道症状、鼻和眼部分泌物到腹泻不等,也与访视前一天较高的死亡率无关。农民、家庭成员或农场工人的所有咽喉拭子衣原体DNA检测均为阴性,没有进一步表明可能存在禽传人(或人传禽)传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6383/5764275/dd8907b4ac24/pone.0190774.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验