University Paris-Est, ANSES, Laboratory for Animal Health, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, 94700, France; Department of Avian Medicine and Poultry Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Coyoacan, 04510, D.F., Mexico.
Department of Avian Medicine and Poultry Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Coyoacan, 04510, D.F., Mexico.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Mar;176:104922. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104922. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
Chlamydiaceae infections in poultry are mainly due to Chlamydia psittaci and Chlamydia gallinacea. While C. psittaci has long been known to affect birds and to have zoonotic potential, C. gallinacea is a newly described species that has been found to be widespread in chickens. As no data were available regarding the presence of Chlamydiaceae in Mexican poultry, a cross-sectional survey to detect the presence of Chlamydiaceae on commercial and backyard farms was carried out in eight federal states of Mexico with a high poultry density. Individual cloacal swabs were collected on 14 large-scale commercial poultry farms with controlled environment houses, 23 large-scale commercial poultry farms with open-sided houses, and 16 backyard farms. Samples were tested using a specific Chlamydiaceae real-time PCR technique. Chlamydial species were subsequently identified by a species-specific real-time PCR method. Information on potential risk factors was collected through a questionnaire. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with Chlamydiaceae-positive results at the farm level on commercial farms. For backyard farms, a mixed-effect logistic regression model was used to consider information collected either at the animal or at the farm level. Overall, 7.1 % (n = 1/14) of controlled environment commercial farms, 26.1 % (n = 6/23) of open-sided commercial farms, and 75.0 % (n = 12/16) of backyard farms were Chlamydiaceae-positive. Apparent prevalence increased inversely to the level of confinement (controlled environment vs open-sided poultry houses vs backyards). Chlamydia gallinacea was the only chlamydial species detected. On commercial farms, egg-laying hen flocks had 6.7 times higher odds of being Chlamydiaceae-infected than broilers flocks (OR = 6.7, 95 % CI: 1.1-44.3, p = 0.04). On backyard farms, two variables were significantly associated with Chlamydiaceae infection: the lack of antibiotic use (OR = 8.4, 95 % CI: 1.84-38.49, p = 0.006), and an impaired health status (OR=8.8, 95 % CI: 1.9-38.9, p = 0.004). Further studies should be carried out to investigate the impact of C. gallinacea infection on egg quality and production performance in egg-laying hen flocks.
家禽中的衣原体科感染主要由鹦鹉热衣原体和鸡衣原体引起。虽然鹦鹉热衣原体早已被证实会影响鸟类,并具有潜在的人畜共患病性,但鸡衣原体是一种新描述的物种,已广泛存在于鸡群中。由于墨西哥家禽中没有关于衣原体科存在的数据,因此在墨西哥 8 个家禽密度较高的联邦州进行了一项横断面调查,以检测商业和后院农场中衣原体科的存在情况。在 14 个采用环境控制房屋的大型商业家禽养殖场、23 个采用开放式房屋的大型商业家禽养殖场和 16 个后院养殖场采集了个体泄殖腔拭子样本。使用特定的衣原体科实时 PCR 技术对样本进行了检测。随后通过种特异性实时 PCR 方法鉴定了衣原体种。通过问卷收集了潜在风险因素的信息。采用逻辑回归分析确定了商业养殖场中与衣原体科阳性结果相关的农场水平风险因素。对于后院养殖场,采用混合效应逻辑回归模型,考虑在动物或农场水平收集的信息。总体而言,7.1%(n=1/14)的环境控制商业养殖场、26.1%(n=6/23)的开放式商业养殖场和 75.0%(n=12/16)的后院养殖场为衣原体科阳性。明显的流行率与封闭程度呈反比(环境控制与开放式禽舍与后院)。仅检测到鸡衣原体。在商业养殖场中,蛋鸡群感染衣原体的可能性比肉鸡群高 6.7 倍(OR=6.7,95%CI:1.1-44.3,p=0.04)。在后院养殖场,有两个变量与衣原体感染显著相关:缺乏抗生素使用(OR=8.4,95%CI:1.84-38.49,p=0.006)和健康状况受损(OR=8.8,95%CI:1.9-38.9,p=0.004)。应进一步开展研究,以调查鸡衣原体感染对蛋鸡群产蛋质量和生产性能的影响。