Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):703-708. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.023. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
After hepatectomy, 7%-19% of patients are readmitted within 30 days, accounting for substantial cost and poor patient experience. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a proactive outreach intervention on readmissions.
Consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy by a single surgeon 2012-2016 were identified in a prospectively maintained database. In August 2013 a postoperative intervention was implemented; an advanced practice provider called each patient within 72 hours of discharge. Readmission rates were compared pre- and postintervention using standard statistics.
Two hundred thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and major hepatectomy was performed in 45.5% of patients. Although the complication rate was similar (25.0% preintervention and 19.4% postintervention, P = .324), readmissions within 30 days of operation decreased from 14.5% pre- to 6.5% postintervention (P = .046). Approximately 30% of outreach interactions required outpatient intervention. Factors associated with readmission on univariate analysis included increased operative time (P = .007), major hepatectomy (P = .012), hemi or extended hepatectomy (P = .032), second stage operation (P = .031), bile leak (P = 0.022), and any complication/modified Accordion complication ≥ 3 within 30 days (P <.0001). On multivariate analysis, lack of post-discharge intervention (P = .012) and bile leak (P = .031) were independently associated with readmission.
These data demonstrate the efficacy of a proactive communication intervention after discharge to decrease readmissions after hepatectomy. The additional work created by the intervention is likely offset by decreased inpatient care needs and costs. Identification of high-risk populations and application of technology are likely to lead to further improvements.
肝切除术后,7%-19%的患者在 30 天内再次入院,这导致了巨大的成本和较差的患者体验。本研究旨在分析主动外展干预对再入院的影响。
通过前瞻性维护的数据库确定了 2012 年至 2016 年间由单一外科医生进行肝切除术的连续患者。2013 年 8 月,实施了术后干预措施;一名高级实践提供者在患者出院后 72 小时内打电话给每位患者。使用标准统计数据比较干预前后的再入院率。
231 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 45.5%的患者接受了主要肝切除术。尽管并发症发生率相似(干预前为 25.0%,干预后为 19.4%,P=0.324),但术后 30 天内的再入院率从干预前的 14.5%降至干预后的 6.5%(P=0.046)。大约 30%的外展互动需要门诊干预。单因素分析中与再入院相关的因素包括手术时间延长(P=0.007)、主要肝切除术(P=0.012)、半肝或扩大肝切除术(P=0.032)、二期手术(P=0.031)、胆漏(P=0.022)和术后 30 天内任何并发症/改良 Accordion 并发症≥3(P<.0001)。多因素分析显示,缺乏出院后干预(P=0.012)和胆漏(P=0.031)与再入院独立相关。
这些数据表明,出院后主动沟通干预可降低肝切除术后再入院率。干预产生的额外工作可能会因减少住院护理需求和成本而得到弥补。识别高危人群和应用技术可能会进一步改善。