Jareño-Collado R, Sánchez-Sánchez M M, Fraile-Gamo M P, García-Crespo N, Barba-Aragón S, Bermejo-García H, Sánchez-Izquierdo R, Sánchez-Muñoz E I, López-López A, Arias-Rivera S
Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, España.
Hospital Universitario de Getafe, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Getafe, Madrid, España.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan-Mar;29(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2017.11.001. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
Ecchymosis and/or haematoma are the most common adverse events after subcutaneous administration of low molecular weight heparin. There is no strong recommendation as to the puncture site.
To evaluate the adverse events, ecchymosis and/or haematoma after the administration of prophylactic subcutaneous enoxaparin in the abdomen vs the arm in the critically ill patient.
A randomised, two-arm clinical trial (injection in the abdomen vs the arm), performed between July 2014 and January 2017, in an 18-bed, polyvalent intensive care unit. Patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin, admitted >72h, with no liver or haematological disorders, a body mass index (BMI) >18.5, not pregnant, of legal age and with no skin lesions which would impede assessment were included. We excluded patients who died or who were transferred to another hospital before completing the evaluation. We gathered demographic and clinical variables, and the onset of ecchymosis and/or haematomas at the injection site after 12, 24, 48 and 72hours. A descriptive analysis was undertaken, with group comparison and logistic regression. The study was approved by the ethics committee with the signed consent of patients/families.
301 cases (11 excluded): 149 were injected in the abdomen vs 141 in the arm. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical variables, BMI, enoxaparin dose or antiplatelet administration [ecchymosis, abdomen vs arm, n(%): 66(44) vs 72(51), P=.25] [haematoma abdomen vs arm, n(%): 9(6) vs 14(10), P=.2]. Statistical significance was found in the size of the haematomas after 72h: [area of haematoma (mm) abdomen vs arm, median (IQR): 2(1-5.25) vs 20(5.25-156), P=.027].
In our patient cohort, prophylactic subcutaneous enoxaparin administered in the abdomen causes fewer haematomas after 72hours, than when administered in the arm. The incidence rate of ecchymosis and haematoma was lower than the published incidence in critically ill patients, although patients receiving anti-platelet agents present a higher risk of injury. No relationship was observed in relation to BMI.
皮下注射低分子量肝素后,瘀斑和/或血肿是最常见的不良事件。关于穿刺部位尚无有力推荐。
评估危重症患者腹部与手臂皮下注射预防性依诺肝素后的不良事件、瘀斑和/或血肿情况。
2014年7月至2017年1月期间,在一家拥有18张床位的多科室重症监护病房进行了一项随机双臂临床试验(腹部注射与手臂注射)。纳入接受预防性依诺肝素治疗、入院超过72小时、无肝脏或血液系统疾病、体重指数(BMI)>18.5、非妊娠、达到法定年龄且无妨碍评估的皮肤病变的患者。排除在完成评估前死亡或转至其他医院的患者。收集人口统计学和临床变量,以及12、24、48和72小时后注射部位瘀斑和/或血肿的发生情况。进行描述性分析、组间比较和逻辑回归分析。该研究经伦理委员会批准,并获得患者/家属签署的同意书。
共301例(排除11例):149例在腹部注射,141例在手臂注射。人口统计学和临床变量、BMI、依诺肝素剂量或抗血小板药物使用方面无显著差异[瘀斑,腹部与手臂,n(%):66(44)对72(51),P = 0.25] [血肿,腹部与手臂,n(%):9(6)对14(10),P = 0.2]。72小时后血肿大小存在统计学差异:[血肿面积(mm),腹部与手臂,中位数(IQR):2(1 - 5.25)对20(5.25 - 156),P = 0.027]。
在我们的患者队列中,腹部皮下注射预防性依诺肝素72小时后产生的血肿比手臂注射少。瘀斑和血肿的发生率低于已发表的危重症患者发生率,尽管接受抗血小板药物治疗的患者受伤风险更高。未观察到与BMI的相关性。