Suppr超能文献

《慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并多种共病患者综合护理方案(PIC COPD):一项随机对照试验》。

Program of Integrated Care for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Multiple Comorbidities (PIC COPD): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Medicine Health Service, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2018 Jan 11;51(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01567-2017. Print 2018 Jan.

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component, case manager-led exacerbation prevention/management model for reducing emergency department visits. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation, mortality, health-related quality of life, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity, COPD self-efficacy, anxiety and depression.Two-centre randomised controlled trial recruiting patients with ≥2 prognostically important COPD-associated comorbidities. We compared our multi-component intervention including individualised care/action plans and telephone consults (12-weekly then 9-monthly) with usual care (both groups). We used zero-inflated Poisson models to examine emergency department visits and hospitalisation; Cox proportional hazard model for mortality.We randomised 470 participants (236 intervention, 234 control). There were no differences in number of emergency department visits or hospital admissions between groups. We detected difference in emergency department visit risk, for those that visited the emergency department, favouring the intervention (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86). Similarly, risk of hospital admission was lower in the intervention group for those requiring hospital admission (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88). Fewer intervention patients died (21 36) (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.95). No differences were detected in other secondary outcomes.Our multi-component, case manager-led exacerbation prevention/management model resulted in no difference in emergency department visits, hospital admissions and other secondary outcomes. Estimated risk of death (intervention) was nearly half that of the control.

摘要

我们旨在评估一种多组分、个案经理主导的恶化预防/管理模式在减少急诊就诊方面的有效性。次要结局包括住院、死亡、健康相关生活质量、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)严重程度、COPD 自我效能、焦虑和抑郁。在两家中心进行的招募有≥2 种预后重要的 COPD 相关合并症的患者的随机对照试验。我们将我们的多组分干预措施(包括个体化护理/行动计划和电话咨询(每周 12 次,然后每 9 个月 1 次)与常规护理进行了比较(两组)。我们使用零膨胀泊松模型来检查急诊就诊和住院情况;使用 Cox 比例风险模型检查死亡率。我们随机分配了 470 名参与者(236 名干预组,234 名对照组)。两组之间的急诊就诊次数或住院入院次数没有差异。我们检测到,对于那些就诊于急诊的患者,干预组的急诊就诊风险存在差异,有利于干预组(RR0.74,95%CI0.63-0.86)。同样,对于需要住院治疗的患者,干预组的住院入院风险较低(RR0.69,95%CI0.54-0.88)。干预组死亡人数较少(21 例 36 例)(HR0.56,95%CI0.32-0.95)。在其他次要结局方面没有差异。我们的多组分、个案经理主导的恶化预防/管理模式在急诊就诊、住院和其他次要结局方面没有差异。(干预)死亡的估计风险几乎是对照组的一半。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验