Mufti Sonam, Dadawala Sarvagna Mayank, Patel Phoram, Shah Monali, Dave Deepak Harish
Department of Periodontology, Vaidik Dental College and Research Center, Daman, India.
Department of Periodontology, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):531-537. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_325_17.
One of the most common aesthetic problem encountered in the field of periodontology is gingival recession, which is, perceived by the patients as increase in length of teeth. The treatment of buccal gingival recession is a common requirement due to aesthetic concern or root sensitivity. This study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of PRF membrane compared to that of CTG in Miller's class I gingival recessions.
32 sites with Miller's Class I gingival recessions, out of which 16 sites received PRF (test) and 16 sites received CTG (control). Each patient had undergone an initial periodontal treatment, including oral hygiene instructions, plaque control, and scaling and root planing, followed by re-evaluation. All clinical recordings; recession height, recession width, clinical attachment level, height of keratinized tissue, thickness of keratinized tissue, healing index and pain perception, were performed immediately before surgery (baseline) and after 6 months interval following periodontal surgery.
In the test group, significant improvement was seen in terms CAL, REC-HT, REC-WD, HKT and TKT from baseline to 6 months. In the control group, only significant improvement seen was in REC-HT and TKT from baseline to 6 months. Comparison of both Healing Index and VAS score was done and it showed no significant difference between test and the control group except VAS at 1 week.
Though CTG is a gold standard procedure, PRF can be used as an alternative procedure by keeping patient's comfort and recognition in mind.
牙周病学领域中最常见的美学问题之一是牙龈退缩,患者会将其视为牙齿长度增加。由于美学考量或牙根敏感,颊侧牙龈退缩的治疗是一项常见需求。本研究旨在评估富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)膜与结缔组织移植(CTG)相比在米勒I类牙龈退缩治疗中的疗效。
选取32个米勒I类牙龈退缩部位,其中16个部位接受PRF治疗(试验组),16个部位接受CTG治疗(对照组)。每位患者均接受了初始牙周治疗,包括口腔卫生指导、菌斑控制以及龈上洁治和根面平整,随后进行重新评估。所有临床记录,包括退缩高度、退缩宽度、临床附着水平、角化组织高度、角化组织厚度、愈合指数和疼痛感知,均在手术前(基线)以及牙周手术后6个月间隔期结束后立即进行。
试验组中,从基线到6个月,临床附着水平(CAL)、退缩高度(REC-HT)、退缩宽度(REC-WD)、角化组织高度(HKT)和角化组织厚度(TKT)均有显著改善。对照组中,从基线到6个月,仅退缩高度(REC-HT)和角化组织厚度(TKT)有显著改善。对愈合指数和视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行了比较,结果显示试验组和对照组之间除1周时的VAS评分外无显著差异。
尽管CTG是一种金标准手术方法,但考虑到患者的舒适度和认可度,PRF可作为一种替代方法使用。