Suppr超能文献

肥胖症患者与非暴食症患者的认知控制功能。

Cognitive control functions in individuals with obesity with and without binge-eating disorder.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University Hospital of Bochum, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Mar;51(3):233-240. doi: 10.1002/eat.22824. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Deficits in cognitive control are thought to contribute to the maintenance of obesity (OB). Cognitive control is referred to as impulsivity and binge-eating disorder (BED) is characterized by high levels of impulsivity. The present study sought to elucidate which cognitive control functions differentiate between severe OB with and without BED also taking into account hunger as a moderating factor.

METHOD

The study included 48 individuals with OB and BED (OB + BED), 48 individuals with OB and no BED (OB - BED) and 48 normal-weight controls (NWC). Hunger was systematically manipulated: participants were instructed to refrain from eating before testing and received either a liquid meal or flavored water. Then, a comprehensive test battery was administered including a food-related go/no-go task and several subtests from the CANTAB.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups with regard to food-related response inhibition. However, while manipulating hunger had no impact on performance in the go/no-go task, self-reported hunger significantly influenced task performance by increasing inhibition deficits to high-caloric stimuli in OB + BED. With regard to general cognitive control functions, we found that deficits in attention and impulse control in decision-making distinguished OB from NWC, while reversal learning and risk taking in decision-making appeared to be relevant factors when distinguishing OB + BED from OB - BED.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that self-reported hunger differentially affected food-related response inhibition. Group differences in general cognitive control functions were limited to attention, reversal learning, and decision-making. Future research needs to account for other possible moderating factors, such as mood, food craving, or stress.

摘要

目的

认知控制缺陷被认为是导致肥胖(OB)持续存在的原因。认知控制被称为冲动,而暴食障碍(BED)的特点是高度冲动。本研究旨在阐明哪些认知控制功能可以区分伴有和不伴有 BED 的严重 OB,同时考虑到饥饿作为一个调节因素。

方法

该研究纳入了 48 名伴有 BED 的 OB 患者(OB+BED)、48 名不伴有 BED 的 OB 患者(OB-BED)和 48 名正常体重对照者(NWC)。系统地操纵饥饿感:参与者在测试前被要求禁食,并接受液体餐或调味水。然后,进行了一个全面的测试组合,包括一个与食物相关的 Go/No-Go 任务和来自 CANTAB 的几个子测试。

结果

三组之间在与食物相关的反应抑制方面没有差异。然而,当操纵饥饿感对 Go/No-Go 任务的表现没有影响时,自我报告的饥饿感通过增加对高热量刺激的抑制缺陷,显著影响了任务表现,这在 OB+BED 中尤为明显。关于一般认知控制功能,我们发现,注意力和冲动控制在决策中的缺陷将 OB 与 NWC 区分开来,而在决策中的反转学习和冒险行为似乎是将 OB+BED 与 OB-BED 区分开来的相关因素。

讨论

我们的结果表明,自我报告的饥饿感对与食物相关的反应抑制有不同的影响。一般认知控制功能的组间差异仅限于注意力、反转学习和决策。未来的研究需要考虑其他可能的调节因素,如情绪、食物渴望或压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验