Douglas P S, Reichek N, Plappert T, Muhammad A, Sutton M S
Am Heart J. 1985 Nov;110(5):1012-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90202-9.
M-mode echocardiographic relative wall thickness (RWT) has been used extensively as an index of left ventricular hypertrophy. To determine whether the more extensive tomographic sampling and enhanced spatial orientation provided by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) might improve the value of RWT analysis, we compared 2DE and M-mode RWT in 69 subjects (19 normals, 13 with aortic stenosis, 22 with aortic regurgitation, and 15 with congestive cardiomyopathy). M-mode results correlated relatively weakly with 2DE RWT (r = 0.62 at end diastole; r = 0.81 at end systole). End-systolic M-mode values were larger than 2DE results, while end-diastolic M-mode values were generally smaller than 2DE results (both p less than 0.001). Thus, in congestive cardiomyopathy M-mode RWT was larger than 2DE end-diastolic results and therefore failed to distinguish between cardiomyopathy, aortic regurgitation, and normals. We conclude that M-mode and 2DE analysis of RWT yield disparate results. Moreover, 2DE may enhance the value of RWT in the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy due to volume overload and cardiomyopathy.
M型超声心动图相对室壁厚度(RWT)已被广泛用作左心室肥厚的指标。为了确定二维超声心动图(2DE)所提供的更广泛断层采样和增强的空间定位是否可能提高RWT分析的价值,我们比较了69例受试者(19例正常人、13例主动脉瓣狭窄患者、22例主动脉瓣反流患者和15例充血性心肌病患者)的2DE和M型RWT。M型结果与2DE RWT的相关性相对较弱(舒张末期r = 0.62;收缩末期r = 0.81)。收缩末期M型值大于2DE结果,而舒张末期M型值通常小于2DE结果(两者p均小于0.001)。因此,在充血性心肌病中,M型RWT大于2DE舒张末期结果,因此无法区分心肌病、主动脉瓣反流和正常人。我们得出结论,M型和2DE对RWT的分析产生不同的结果。此外,2DE可能会提高RWT在评估容量负荷过重和心肌病所致左心室肥厚方面的价值。