University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan.
Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8553, Japan.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.081. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Previous studies have suggested the consequence of mental health-related public stigma: the problem of knowledge may develop into problem of attitude and behaviour. However, this has not been directly explored in a longitudinal study. As the secondary analysis from our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) for 219 participants who completed the survey at the 12-month follow-up, we aimed to investigate whether the knowledge and attitude components of stigma toward people with schizophrenia affect each other. At baseline and at 12 months, three types of stigma scales were measured: favorable understanding, negative stereotype, and social distance toward people with schizophrenia. A structured equation model was fitted to the trajectory of stigma scales taking into account the effect of the other stigma components and the interventions. The results showed that greater social distance toward people with schizophrenia at baseline was associated with less favorable understanding and more negative stereotype at the 12-month follow-up. This was not in line with the existing consequences from the previous studies; however, in line with the recent RCTs showing that social contact is the most effective intervention to reduce stigma. Future observational studies with a larger sample size are needed to clarify this relationship further.
知识问题可能发展成态度和行为问题。然而,这在纵向研究中并未得到直接探讨。作为我们之前针对 219 名参与者的随机对照试验(RCT)的二次分析,这些参与者在 12 个月的随访中完成了调查,我们旨在探讨针对精神分裂症患者的污名的知识和态度成分是否会相互影响。在基线和 12 个月时,测量了三种污名量表:对精神分裂症患者的有利理解、负面刻板印象和社会距离。考虑到其他污名成分和干预措施的影响,采用结构方程模型拟合污名量表的轨迹。结果表明,基线时针对精神分裂症患者的社会距离越大,在 12 个月的随访中,对患者的有利理解越少,负面刻板印象越多。这与先前研究中存在的后果不一致;然而,与最近的 RCT 一致,表明社会接触是减少污名最有效的干预措施。需要进一步开展具有更大样本量的前瞻性观察研究来阐明这种关系。