• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表现相似性预示着二元和三元联合视觉搜索中的集体效益。

Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search.

作者信息

Wahn Basil, Czeszumski Artur, König Peter

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, Center of Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 12;13(1):e0191179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191179. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191179
PMID:29329331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5766227/
Abstract

When humans perform tasks together, they may reach a higher performance in comparison to the best member of a group (i.e., a collective benefit). Earlier research showed that interindividual performance similarities predict collective benefits for several joint tasks. Yet, researchers did not test whether this is the case for joint visuospatial tasks. Also, researchers did not investigate whether dyads and triads reach a collective benefit when they are forbidden to exchange any information while performing a visuospatial task. In this study, participants performed a joint visual search task either alone, in dyads, or in triads, and were not allowed to exchange any information while doing the task. We found that dyads reached a collective benefit. Triads did outperform their best individual member and dyads-yet, they did not outperform the best dyad pairing within the triad. In addition, similarities in performance significantly predicted the collective benefit for dyads and triads. Furthermore, we find that the dyads' and triads' search performances closely match a simulated performance based on the individual search performances, which assumed that members of a group act independently. Overall, the present study supports the view that performance similarities predict collective benefits in joint tasks. Moreover, it provides a basis for future studies to investigate the benefits of exchanging information between co-actors in joint visual search tasks.

摘要

当人类一起执行任务时,与小组中表现最佳的成员相比,他们可能会达到更高的绩效(即集体效益)。早期研究表明,个体间的绩效相似性能够预测多项联合任务的集体效益。然而,研究人员并未测试在联合视觉空间任务中是否也是如此。此外,研究人员也没有探究在执行视觉空间任务时,二人组和三人组在被禁止交流任何信息的情况下是否能实现集体效益。在本研究中,参与者单独、以二人组或三人组的形式执行一项联合视觉搜索任务,并且在任务过程中不允许交流任何信息。我们发现二人组实现了集体效益。三人组的表现确实优于其最佳个体成员和二人组——然而,他们并没有超过三人组内最佳的二人组组合。此外,绩效的相似性显著预测了二人组和三人组的集体效益。此外,我们发现二人组和三人组的搜索绩效与基于个体搜索绩效模拟的绩效紧密匹配,该模拟假设小组中的成员独立行动。总体而言,本研究支持这样一种观点,即绩效相似性能够预测联合任务中的集体效益。此外,它为未来研究调查联合视觉搜索任务中共同行动者之间信息交流的益处提供了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/42ffffb63c07/pone.0191179.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/caa2b7e31d58/pone.0191179.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/59f7aa247645/pone.0191179.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/027edd95e66e/pone.0191179.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/42ffffb63c07/pone.0191179.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/caa2b7e31d58/pone.0191179.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/59f7aa247645/pone.0191179.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/027edd95e66e/pone.0191179.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fcb/5766227/42ffffb63c07/pone.0191179.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search.表现相似性预示着二元和三元联合视觉搜索中的集体效益。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 12;13(1):e0191179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191179. eCollection 2018.
2
Dyadic and triadic search: Benefits, costs, and predictors of group performance.二元和三元搜索:群体绩效的益处、成本及预测因素。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2415-2433. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01915-0.
3
Neurophysiological correlates of collective perceptual decision-making.集体知觉决策的神经生理学相关性。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Apr;51(7):1676-1696. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14545. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Social influence protects collective decision making from equality bias.社会影响可保护集体决策免受平等偏见的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb;42(2):164-72. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000145. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.两个追踪器优于一个:关于合作参与者的行动和表现分数的信息有助于在联合视觉空间任务中实现集体利益。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 3;8:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669. eCollection 2017.
6
Exchange and cohesion in dyads and triads: A test of Simmel's hypothesis.二联体和三联体中的交换与内聚:对齐美尔假设的检验。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Nov;42(6):1457-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-making.共同地、缓慢但确定地:社会互动和反馈在集体决策中获益积累的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):3-8. doi: 10.1037/a0025708. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.多感官协作:使用触觉或听觉显示器来交换注视信息可提高联合视觉搜索的表现。
Ergonomics. 2016 Jun;59(6):781-95. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1099742. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
9
Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.群体智慧与复杂信息整合下的生存情境中的集体决策。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 15;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00248-z.
10
Does popularity determine who leads in a dyadic cooperative task? Subtle differences between children with and without developmental disabilities.在二元合作任务中,人气决定谁占主导地位吗?有无发育障碍儿童之间的细微差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Nov;94:103455. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103455. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting group benefits in joint multiple object tracking : Predicting group benefits.预测联合多目标跟踪中的群体效益:预测群体效益。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1962-1975. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02693-6. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
Labor division in collaborative visual search: a review.协同视觉搜索中的劳动分工:综述。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1323-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01767-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
Multivariate model for cooperation: bridging social physiological compliance and hyperscanning.合作的多变量模型:连接社会生理学顺应和超扫描。

本文引用的文献

1
Making better decisions in groups.在群体中做出更好的决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170193. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170193. eCollection 2017 Aug.
2
Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.两个追踪器优于一个:关于合作参与者的行动和表现分数的信息有助于在联合视觉空间任务中实现集体利益。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 3;8:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669. eCollection 2017.
3
Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):193-209. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa119.
4
Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction.超扫描:一种研究社会互动中脑间神经基础的有效方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 28;14:39. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039. eCollection 2020.
5
The Social Situation Affects How We Process Feedback About Our Actions.社会情境会影响我们如何处理关于自身行为的反馈。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 25;10:361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00361. eCollection 2019.
6
Let's Move It Together: A Review of Group Benefits in Joint Object Control.让我们一起行动:联合物体控制中群体优势的综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 7;9:918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00918. eCollection 2018.
处于同一波长的团队表现更佳:脑间相位同步构成了社会促进作用的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:425-436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.联合行动:心理表征、共享信息与与他人协调的一般机制
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039. eCollection 2016.
5
The perceptual and social components of metacognition.元认知的感知和社会成分。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Aug;145(8):949-65. doi: 10.1037/xge0000180. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments.通过汇总独立判断来加强医学诊断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 2;113(31):8777-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601827113. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
7
Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.多感官协作:使用触觉或听觉显示器来交换注视信息可提高联合视觉搜索的表现。
Ergonomics. 2016 Jun;59(6):781-95. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1099742. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory.协作记忆:认知研究与理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):649-63. doi: 10.1177/1745691610388763.
9
Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production.涉及双手力量产生的联合动作中的运动控制层级。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3736-43. doi: 10.1152/jn.00313.2015. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.平等偏见会损害跨文化的集体决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3835-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421692112. Epub 2015 Mar 9.