• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发健康信息技术可用性场景和任务时需要考虑的十个因素。

Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.

机构信息

Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Health Services Research and Development Service (VA HSR&D), Center for Health Information and Communication, United States; Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States; Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Department of Industrial Engineering, J.B. Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States; Center for Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2018 Feb;78:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.001
PMID:29329702
Abstract

The quality of usability testing is highly dependent upon the associated usability scenarios. To promote usability testing as part of electronic health record (EHR) certification, the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology requires that vendors test specific capabilities of EHRs with clinical end-users and report their usability testing process - including the test scenarios used - along with the results. The ONC outlines basic expectations for usability testing, but there is little guidance in usability texts or scientific literature on how to develop usability scenarios for healthcare applications. The objective of this article is to outline key factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks to evaluate computer-interface based health information technologies. To achieve this goal, we draw upon a decade of our experience conducting usability tests with a variety of healthcare applications and a wide range of end-users, to include healthcare professionals as well as patients. We discuss 10 key factors that influence scenario development: objectives of usability testing; roles of end-user(s); target performance goals; evaluation time constraints; clinical focus; fidelity; scenario-related bias and confounders; embedded probes; minimize risks to end-users; and healthcare related outcome measures. For each factor, we present an illustrative example. This article is intended to aid usability researchers and practitioners in their efforts to advance health information technologies. The article provides broad guidance on usability scenario development and can be applied to a wide range of clinical information systems and applications.

摘要

可用性测试的质量高度依赖于相关的可用性场景。为了将可用性测试作为电子健康记录(EHR)认证的一部分进行推广,国家卫生信息技术协调员办公室(ONC)要求供应商与临床最终用户一起测试 EHR 的特定功能,并报告他们的可用性测试过程——包括使用的测试场景——以及结果。ONC 概述了可用性测试的基本期望,但在可用性文本或科学文献中,几乎没有关于如何为医疗保健应用程序开发可用性场景的指导。本文的目的是概述开发可用性场景和任务以评估基于计算机接口的健康信息技术时需要考虑的关键因素。为了实现这一目标,我们借鉴了我们在使用各种医疗保健应用程序和广泛的最终用户(包括医疗保健专业人员和患者)进行可用性测试方面十年的经验。我们讨论了影响场景开发的 10 个关键因素:可用性测试的目标;最终用户的角色;目标绩效目标;评估时间限制;临床重点;逼真度;与场景相关的偏差和混杂因素;嵌入式探针;最大限度地降低最终用户的风险;以及与医疗保健相关的结果衡量标准。对于每个因素,我们都提供了一个示例。本文旨在帮助可用性研究人员和从业者努力推进健康信息技术。本文提供了有关可用性场景开发的广泛指导,可以应用于广泛的临床信息系统和应用程序。

相似文献

1
Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.开发健康信息技术可用性场景和任务时需要考虑的十个因素。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Feb;78:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
2
A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.一个用于评估电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计和可用性测试流程的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e35-e39. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw092.
3
Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.电子健康记录可用性:对十一家电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计过程的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1179-82. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv050. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
4
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.全国临床信息学技术系统调查问卷研究证明:医生深受可用性差之苦。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
5
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.可用性问题不会自行解决:芬兰医生使用电子健康记录的全国性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.比较电子健康记录可用性的障碍。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e191-e193. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw117.
7
Approaches to Demonstrating the Effectiveness and Impact of Usability Testing of Healthcare Information Technology.证明医疗信息技术可用性测试的有效性和影响的方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:244-249.
8
Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing: Its Application in Both Product Development and System Implementation.低成本快速可用性测试:其在产品开发与系统实施中的应用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:195-200.
9
Adequate number of clinicians on usability tests lacking, says study.研究称,可用性测试中缺乏足够数量的临床医生。
ED Manag. 2015 Dec;27(12):137-41.
10
Usability Analysis of Contending Electronic Health Record Systems.竞争电子健康记录系统的可用性分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:430-435.

引用本文的文献

1
SIGNALING SEPSIS SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT & VALIDATION.脓毒症信号情景的开发与验证
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2018 Sep;62(1):615-619. doi: 10.1177/1541931218621140. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Improving safety claims in digital health interventions using the digital health assessment method.使用数字健康评估方法提高数字健康干预措施中的安全性声明。
Digit Health. 2024 Jul 25;10:20552076241258756. doi: 10.1177/20552076241258756. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Low-Fidelity Prototype of a Sensor-Dependent Interaction Platform: Formative Evaluation With Informal Caregivers of Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.
一种基于传感器的交互平台的低保真原型:对认知障碍老年人非正式照料者的形成性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 22;8:e53402. doi: 10.2196/53402.
4
Characterizing patient details-related challenges from health information technology-related incident reports from Swedish healthcare.从瑞典医疗保健领域与健康信息技术相关的事件报告中梳理与患者细节有关的挑战。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 6;6:1260521. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1260521. eCollection 2024.
5
Software-related challenges in Swedish healthcare through the lens of incident reports: A desktop study.从事件报告角度看瑞典医疗保健领域与软件相关的挑战:一项案头研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 20;9:20552076231203600. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203600. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Usability Evaluation of a Community Pharmacy Health Information Exchange Interface Prototype.社区药店健康信息交换接口原型的可用性评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):811-821. doi: 10.1055/a-2145-6980. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
7
User Testing of the Veteran Delegation Tool: Qualitative Inquiry.退伍军人授权工具的用户测试:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 23;25:e40634. doi: 10.2196/40634.
8
Optimal Usability Test Procedure Generation for Medical Devices.医疗设备的最佳可用性测试程序生成
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(3):296. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030296.
9
Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Decision Support for Pediatric Infections.儿科感染抗菌药物管理决策支持的评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):108-118. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760082. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Improving the User Experience with Discount Site-Specific User Testing.通过折扣网站特定用户测试改善用户体验。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1040-1052. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758222. Epub 2022 Nov 2.