Suppr超能文献

同性伴侣关系中亲密伴侣暴力风险标志物的 Meta 分析。

A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships.

机构信息

1 Department of Child and Family Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

2 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jul;20(3):374-384. doi: 10.1177/1524838017708784. Epub 2017 May 26.

Abstract

Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in same-sex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的研究主要集中在异性恋关系上,但近年来,研究人员已经将研究重点扩展到包括同性恋关系。本研究采用元分析技术,旨在检验各种风险标志物在男同性恋和女同性恋者中作为身体 IPV 的施害者和受害者的相对强度。通过研究搜索引擎确定文章,并进行筛选以确定符合纳入标准的文章,这一过程产生了 24 篇文章和 114 个元分析效应量。在至少有两个男性和女性施害者效应量的标志物中,最强的风险标志物是心理虐待施害。在至少有两个 IPV 受害者效应量的标志物中,男性的最强风险标志物也是心理虐待施害,女性的最强风险标志物也是心理虐待受害者。在同性恋特定风险标志物中,内化同性恋恐惧和融合分别是男性和女性成为 IPV 施害者的最强预测因素。对于男性和女性来说,艾滋病毒状况和内化同性恋恐惧分别是 IPV 受害者的最强风险标志物。在 10 个关于男女在 IPV 施害和受害者风险标志物比较中,仅发现 1 个显著差异。结果表明,尽管男同性恋和异性恋关系可能有一些共同的 IPV 风险标志物,但同性恋关系中也有身体 IPV 的独特风险标志物。需要进一步的研究和更具体的测量来更好地研究和理解同性恋特定风险标志物对 IPV 的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验