Suppr超能文献

是什么让个人面临身体亲密伴侣暴力侵害的风险?一项针对男性和女性风险标志物的元分析。

What Puts Individuals at Risk for Physical Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration? A Meta-Analysis Examining Risk Markers for Men and Women.

机构信息

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

Loma Linda University, CA, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):36-51. doi: 10.1177/1524838020925776. Epub 2020 May 20.

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration is a serious public health concern around the world. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize all available data examining risk markers for physical IPV perpetration among men and women between 1980 and 2018. Studies were included in the analysis if they examined physical IPV in adult opposite-sex relationships, included statistical information needed to calculate at least one bivariate effect size, and were written in English. A total of 503 studies, yielding 2,972 unique effect sizes, were included in the analysis. Data from these studies allowed for the examination of 63 unique risk markers related to physical IPV perpetration for both men and women, 60 unique risk markers for male perpetration, and 45 unique risk markers for female perpetration. Lastly, we were able to compare the strength of 44 risk markers for physical IPV perpetration between men and women. We found that the strongest risk markers were related to other acts of violence (both perpetration and victimization) as well as relationship dynamics. Results from this study highlight the potential factors that could be focused on in prevention programming and intervention work. Additionally, it was found that 9 out of 44 risk markers significantly differed in strength for men and women, allowing for additional specificity in intervention work for helping professionals working with either male or female perpetrators of physical IPV.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的实施是全世界一个严重的公共卫生问题。本荟萃分析旨在综合所有可用的数据,研究 1980 年至 2018 年间男性和女性实施身体 IPV 的风险标志物。分析中纳入的研究必须符合以下标准:研究对象为成年异性伴侣中的身体 IPV;包括计算至少一个双变量效应量所需的统计信息;以及用英文撰写。该分析共纳入了 503 项研究,产生了 2972 个独特的效应量。这些研究的数据允许我们同时检查 63 个与男性和女性身体 IPV 实施有关的独特风险标志物、60 个与男性实施有关的独特风险标志物和 45 个与女性实施有关的独特风险标志物。最后,我们能够比较 44 个男性和女性身体 IPV 实施风险标志物的强度。我们发现,最强的风险标志物与其他暴力行为(实施和受害)以及关系动态有关。这项研究的结果强调了预防规划和干预工作中可能需要关注的潜在因素。此外,还发现 44 个风险标志物中有 9 个在男性和女性中的强度存在显著差异,这为帮助专业人员对实施身体 IPV 的男性或女性施害者进行干预工作提供了更大的特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验