Suppr超能文献

卫生机构干预亲密伴侣暴力的男性加害者或受害者

Interventions in Health Settings for Male Perpetrators or Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Family Violence Prevention, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Jan;21(1):123-137. doi: 10.1177/1524838017744772. Epub 2017 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common in patients attending health-care services and is associated with a range of health problems. The majority of IPV perpetrators are men, and a substantial minority of men are victims, yet health-care professionals have little evidence or guidance on how to respond to male patients who perpetrate or experience violence in their intimate relationships.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of interventions for male perpetrators or victims of IPV in health settings. Online databases, reference lists, Google Scholar, and gray literature were searched, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. Narrative synthesis methods were used due to the heterogeneity of study types and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies describing 10 interventions met our inclusion criteria: nine randomized controlled trials, four cohort studies, and one case-control study. Interventions were predominantly therapeutic in nature and many were conducted in alcohol treatment settings.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the evidence for effectiveness of interventions in health-care settings was weak, although IPV interventions conducted concurrently with alcohol treatment show some promise. More work is urgently needed in health-care services to determine what interventions might be effective, and in what settings, to improve the response to male perpetrators or victims of IPV.

摘要

背景

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)在就诊于医疗保健服务的患者中很常见,并且与一系列健康问题有关。大多数 IPV 施害者是男性,少数男性是受害者,但医疗保健专业人员在如何应对在亲密关系中施暴或遭受暴力的男性患者方面几乎没有证据或指导。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定在卫生环境中针对 IPV 施害者或受害者的干预措施的有效性。在线数据库、参考文献列表、Google Scholar 和灰色文献都进行了搜索,并应用了纳入/排除标准。由于研究类型和结果测量的异质性,使用了叙述性综合方法。

结果

描述 10 种干预措施的 14 项研究符合我们的纳入标准:9 项随机对照试验、4 项队列研究和 1 项病例对照研究。干预措施主要是治疗性质的,其中许多是在酒精治疗环境中进行的。

结论

总体而言,医疗保健环境中干预措施的有效性证据较弱,但同时进行的 IPV 干预与酒精治疗相结合显示出一些希望。迫切需要在医疗保健服务中开展更多工作,以确定哪些干预措施可能有效,以及在哪些环境中可以改善对 IPV 施害者或受害者的反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验