• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲密伴侣暴力施暴者干预措施中的情绪技能与健康评估:随机对照试验的系统评价

Emotional skills and health assessment in interventions for intimate partner violence perpetrators: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Mora-Pelegrín Miguel, Aranda María, Montes-Berges Beatriz

机构信息

Jaén Penitentiary Center, Jaén, Spain.

Department of Psychology/ Area of Social Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0328034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328034. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328034
PMID:40632759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12240372/
Abstract

The present study had two objectives: 1) To analyze the effectiveness of intervention programs for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators that include learning emotional skills; and 2) to examine whether these programs assess variables related to the health and well-being of IPV perpetrators as a result of the intervention, and whether the obtained personal benefits are leveraged to enhance motivation towards therapy. This systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus and PsycARTICLES databases were searched for articles published between January 2000 and December 2023, in order to identify randomized controlled trials of interventions for IPV perpetrators that included learning emotional skills, and that considered the health and well-being of the participants as motivational aspects in therapy. Fifteen primary studies that met the selection and eligibility criteria were included. The results indicated that slightly over half of the intervention programs for IPV perpetrators who develop emotional competencies were more effective in reducing recidivism and improving variables associated with this type of violence than were those that did not include this type of learning (53% of the trials showed significant differences in favor of the intervention groups). In addition, it became evident that the personal benefits obtained by the participants during therapy, which are related to their health and degree of well-being, are barely considered in efforts to improve motivational strategies. These results have important practical implications: firstly, they allow adjusting the contents of intervention programs for IPV perpetrators more effectively and, secondly, they add new elements that help the participants to improve their motivation and adherence to therapy.

摘要

本研究有两个目标

1)分析针对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)实施者的干预项目的有效性,这些项目包括学习情感技能;2)研究这些项目是否评估因干预而与IPV实施者的健康和幸福相关的变量,以及所获得的个人益处是否被用于增强治疗动机。本系统评价是按照PRISMA指南进行的。在PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和PsycARTICLES数据库中检索了2000年1月至2023年12月发表的文章,以确定针对IPV实施者的干预措施的随机对照试验,这些干预措施包括学习情感技能,并将参与者的健康和幸福视为治疗中的动机因素。纳入了15项符合选择和纳入标准的主要研究。结果表明,对于培养情感能力的IPV实施者,略超过一半的干预项目在减少累犯和改善与这类暴力相关的变量方面比那些不包括这类学习的项目更有效(53%的试验显示干预组有显著差异)。此外,很明显,参与者在治疗期间获得的与他们的健康和幸福程度相关的个人益处,在改善动机策略的努力中几乎没有被考虑。这些结果具有重要的实际意义:首先,它们有助于更有效地调整针对IPV实施者的干预项目的内容;其次,它们增加了有助于参与者提高其治疗动机和依从性的新元素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64c/12240372/5105f7098f7d/pone.0328034.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64c/12240372/ff64a56ddacb/pone.0328034.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64c/12240372/5105f7098f7d/pone.0328034.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64c/12240372/ff64a56ddacb/pone.0328034.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64c/12240372/5105f7098f7d/pone.0328034.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotional skills and health assessment in interventions for intimate partner violence perpetrators: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.亲密伴侣暴力施暴者干预措施中的情绪技能与健康评估:随机对照试验的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 9;20(7):e0328034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328034. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Psychological Inflexibility and Intimate Partner Violence Among Men in an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Based Intervention Program.基于接纳与承诺疗法的干预项目中男性心理灵活性及亲密伴侣暴力行为的变化
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(3):317. doi: 10.3390/bs15030317.
2
Which battering interventions work? An updated Meta-analytic review of intimate partner violence treatment outcome research.哪些打击干预措施有效?亲密伴侣暴力治疗效果研究的最新荟萃分析综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Jul;111:102437. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102437. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Methodological Challenges in Group-based Randomised Controlled Trials for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators: A Meta-summary.
针对亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的群组随机对照试验中的方法学挑战:一项元综述
Psychosoc Interv. 2023 May 26;32(2):123-136. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a9. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Court-mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence: An updated Campbell systematic review.针对被判家庭暴力罪的个人的法庭强制干预措施:坎贝尔系统综述更新版
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 14;17(1):e1151. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1151. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and the Duluth Model classes for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program.一项针对被强制参加家庭暴力项目的男性的接受与承诺疗法和迪尔卢特模式课程的随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Apr;90(4):326-338. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000722.
6
What About the Men? A Critical Review of Men's Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence.男性怎么了?亲密伴侣暴力中男性经历的批判性回顾。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):858-872. doi: 10.1177/15248380211043827. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
7
Cognitive Flexibility and Reaction Time Improvements After Cognitive Training Designed for Men Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.针对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的认知训练后认知灵活性和反应时间的改善:一项试点随机对照试验的结果
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(3):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s10896-021-00304-2. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
ADVANCE integrated group intervention to address both substance use and intimate partner abuse perpetration by men in substance use treatment: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.针对物质使用治疗中男性的物质使用和亲密伴侣虐待行为的 ADVANCE 综合小组干预:一项可行性随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 25;21(1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11012-3.
9
Factors Distinguishing Reciprocal Versus Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence Across Time and Reporter.区分时间和报告人之间互惠与非互惠亲密伴侣暴力的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13654-NP13684. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001475. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.