Anderson Elizabeth J, McClelland Jean, Meyer Krause Caitlin, Krause Keegan C, Garcia David O, Koss Mary P
College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e029880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029880.
Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), or those individuals susceptible to IPV victimisation or perpetration, may benefit from participation in primary, secondary or tertiary interventions to address or mitigate exposure to violence despite mixed evidence of IPV intervention effectiveness. However, participation in such programmes is limited by poor access, sociocultural barriers and programme cost. As the world fast approaches universal access to the internet, web-based technologies and low-cost smartphones, new avenues to provide preventive health services including mobile health (mHealth) tools, platforms and services have emerged. The objective of this systematic review is to assess current web-based and mHealth interventions, which include web-based or mobile-based delivery methods for IPV prevention. Interpersonal violence is defined as perpetration or victimisation of a physical, psychological or sexual nature among adults. Interventions may be at the primary, secondary or tertiary level of the public health model.
This systematic review will incorporate studies focused on any empirical prevention intervention intended for IPV victims or perpetrators of any gender where one or more components is web based or mobile based. Articles will be retrieved from the following academic databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Open Grey, as well Google Scholar. Results will be limited to articles reporting primary data, published since 1998, and in English, Spanish, Portuguese or French. Data extraction procedures will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, a critical appraisal tool, will be used to record ratings of quality and risk of bias among studies selected for inclusion. Content analysis and between-study comparisons will be used to answer the objectives of this review.
Results from this review will be published in an open access format for the benefit of both academic and non-academic audiences, including community organisations and individuals seeking mHealth strategies to reduce and prevent IPV.
CRD42019123006.
亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）的受害者，或那些易遭受IPV侵害或实施IPV行为的个体，尽管IPV干预效果的证据不一，但参与一级、二级或三级干预以应对或减轻暴力暴露可能会有所受益。然而，参与此类项目受到获取途径不佳、社会文化障碍和项目成本的限制。随着世界迅速迈向普及互联网、基于网络的技术和低成本智能手机，提供包括移动健康（mHealth）工具、平台和服务在内的预防性健康服务的新途径已经出现。本系统评价的目的是评估当前基于网络和mHealth的干预措施，其中包括用于预防IPV的基于网络或移动的交付方法。人际暴力被定义为成年人之间身体、心理或性方面的侵害或受害行为。干预措施可能处于公共卫生模式的一级、二级或三级。
本系统评价将纳入针对任何性别的IPV受害者或实施者的任何实证预防干预措施的研究，其中一个或多个组成部分基于网络或移动。文章将从以下学术数据库检索：MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo和Open Grey，以及谷歌学术。结果将限于自1998年以来发表的、以英文、西班牙文、葡萄牙文或法文撰写的报告原始数据的文章。数据提取程序将遵循系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目报告指南。混合方法评估工具（一种批判性评估工具）将用于记录纳入研究的质量评级和偏倚风险。内容分析和研究间比较将用于回答本评价的目标。
本评价的结果将以开放获取的形式发表，以造福学术和非学术受众，包括寻求mHealth策略以减少和预防IPV的社区组织和个人。
CRD42019123006。
