Tibbett Jacqueline, Widerström-Noga Eva G, Thomas Christine K, Field-Fote Edelle C
a The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis , University of Miami Miller School of Medicine , Miami , Florida.
b Department of Physiology and Biophysics , University of Miami , Miami , Florida.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 May;42(3):318-327. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1400727. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: For persons with spinal cord injury, spasticity commonly interferes with activities of daily living such as transfers. Electromyography can be used to objectively measure muscle spasms during transfers, but how electromyographic measures relate to the impact spasticity has on life, or to clinically-rated spasticity, is unclear. We aimed to characterize relationships among spasm duration and magnitude, impact of spasticity on daily life, and a clinical measure of extensor spasticity, as well as to determine reliability of the electromyographic measures.
Participants (N=19) underwent electromyographic measurements of involuntary muscle activity (spasm duration and magnitude) evoked in quadriceps muscles during transfers on two days. Impact of spasticity on daily life was measured with the Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool. Clinically-rated spasticity severity was measured with the Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic reflexes.
No significant associations were found between impact of spasticity and spasm duration, spasm magnitude, or clinical extensor spasticity score. Absolute and normalized spasm duration were positively associated with clinical extensor spasticity score (rho=0.510-0.667, P < 0.05). Spasm measures during transfers had good to excellent day-to-day reliability (rho=0.656-0.846, P < 0.05).
Electromyographic and clinical measures of involuntary activity in the lower extremity do not significantly relate to perceived impact of spasticity on daily life. However, quadriceps spasm duration during transfers is related to clinically-rated extensor spasticity. Electromyography is a reliable method of quantifying quadriceps spasms during transfers. Future investigations should identify factors that influence the impact of spasticity on life, which may help direct treatment strategies to reduce problematic impact.
背景/目的:对于脊髓损伤患者,痉挛通常会干扰诸如转移等日常生活活动。肌电图可用于客观测量转移过程中的肌肉痉挛,但肌电图测量结果与痉挛对生活的影响或临床评定的痉挛之间的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在描述痉挛持续时间和幅度、痉挛对日常生活的影响以及伸肌痉挛的临床测量指标之间的关系,并确定肌电图测量的可靠性。
19名参与者在两天的转移过程中接受了股四头肌非自愿肌肉活动(痉挛持续时间和幅度)的肌电图测量。使用脊髓损伤痉挛评估工具测量痉挛对日常生活的影响。使用脊髓痉挛反射评估工具测量临床评定的痉挛严重程度。
未发现痉挛对生活的影响与痉挛持续时间、痉挛幅度或临床伸肌痉挛评分之间存在显著关联。绝对和标准化的痉挛持续时间与临床伸肌痉挛评分呈正相关(rho = 0.510 - 0.667,P < 0.05)。转移过程中的痉挛测量具有良好至极佳的日常可靠性(rho = 0.656 - 0.846,P < 0.05)。
下肢非自愿活动的肌电图和临床测量指标与痉挛对日常生活的感知影响无显著关联。然而,转移过程中的股四头肌痉挛持续时间与临床评定的伸肌痉挛有关。肌电图是量化转移过程中股四头肌痉挛的可靠方法。未来的研究应确定影响痉挛对生活影响的因素,这可能有助于指导治疗策略以减少问题影响。