Singh Hardeep, Unger Janelle, Zariffa José, Pakosh Maureen, Jaglal Susan, Craven B Catharine, Musselman Kristin E
a Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network , Toronto , ON , Canada.
b Rehabilitation Sciences Institute , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Oct;13(7):704-715. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1425747. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Abstact Purpose: To provide an overview of the feasibility and outcomes of robotic-assisted upper extremity training for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify gaps in current research and articulate future research directions.
A systematic search was conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CCTR, CDSR, CINAHL and PubMed on June 7, 2017. Search terms included 3 themes: (1) robotics; (2) SCI; (3) upper extremity. Studies using robots for upper extremity rehabilitation among individuals with cervical SCI were included. Identified articles were independently reviewed by two researchers and compared to pre-specified criteria. Disagreements regarding article inclusion were resolved through discussion. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess article quality. Participant characteristics, study and intervention details, training outcomes, robot features, study limitations and recommendations for future studies were abstracted from included articles.
Twelve articles (one randomized clinical trial, six case series, five case studies) met the inclusion criteria. Five robots were exoskeletons and three were end-effectors. Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 17 subjects. Articles had variable quality, with quality scores ranging from 8 to 20. Studies had a low internal validity primarily from lack of blinding or a control group. Individuals with mild-moderate impairments showed the greatest improvements on body structure/function and performance-level measures. This review is limited by the small number of articles, low-sample sizes and the diversity of devices and their associated training protocols, and outcome measures.
Preliminary evidence suggests robot-assisted interventions are safe, feasible and can reduce active assistance provided by therapists. Implications for rehabilitation Robot-assisted upper extremity training for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury is safe, feasible and can reduce hands-on assistance provided by therapists. Future research in robotics rehabilitation with individuals with spinal cord injury is needed to determine the optimal device and training protocol as well as effectiveness.
摘要目的:概述机器人辅助上肢训练对颈脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的可行性和效果,并找出当前研究中的差距,阐明未来的研究方向。
2017年6月7日,使用Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CCTR、CDSR、CINAHL和PubMed进行了系统检索。检索词包括3个主题:(1)机器人技术;(2)脊髓损伤;(3)上肢。纳入了在颈脊髓损伤患者中使用机器人进行上肢康复的研究。两位研究人员独立审查了检索到的文章,并与预先设定的标准进行比较。关于文章纳入的分歧通过讨论解决。使用改良的唐斯和布莱克清单评估文章质量。从纳入的文章中提取了参与者特征、研究和干预细节、训练结果、机器人特点、研究局限性以及对未来研究的建议。
12篇文章(1篇随机临床试验、6篇病例系列、5篇病例研究)符合纳入标准。5种机器人为外骨骼式,3种为末端执行器式。样本量从1至17名受试者不等。文章质量参差不齐,质量得分从8至20分。研究的内部效度较低,主要原因是缺乏盲法或对照组。轻度至中度损伤的个体在身体结构/功能和表现水平测量方面改善最大。本综述受到文章数量少、样本量小以及设备及其相关训练方案和结果测量的多样性的限制。
初步证据表明机器人辅助干预是安全、可行的,并且可以减少治疗师提供的主动辅助。对康复的启示机器人辅助颈脊髓损伤患者进行上肢训练是安全、可行的,并且可以减少治疗师的亲自协助。需要对脊髓损伤患者进行机器人康复的未来研究,以确定最佳设备和训练方案以及有效性。