Suppr超能文献

小儿血管创伤的实践模式和资源可用性:对美国外科医师学院指定的小儿创伤中心的调查。

Pediatric vascular trauma practice patterns and resource availability: A survey of American College of Surgeon-designated pediatric trauma centers.

机构信息

From the Division of Pediatric Surgery (P.C.B., L.A.G., S.D.S., M.E.S., M.S.D.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):758-761. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001799.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variation exists in pediatric vascular trauma management. We aim to determine practice patterns for vascular trauma management at American College of Surgeons verified pediatric trauma centers and evaluate the resources available for management of vascular trauma at both freestanding children's hospitals (FSCH) and pediatric hospitals within general adult hospitals.

METHODS

Pediatric surgeons and trauma medical directors at American College of Surgeons designated pediatric surgery trauma centers completed a survey designed to evaluate anticipated management of traumatic arterial injuries and resource availability. Hospital setting comparisons were made using Fisher exact tests and t tests. Binomial tests were used to compare pediatric and vascular surgeons' responses to clinical vignettes. p Values of 0.05 or less were significant.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six (42%) of 414 pediatric surgeons participated. Vascular surgeons are more likely to operatively manage vascular trauma at all anatomic sites except subclavian artery when compared to pediatric surgeons, regardless of hospital setting (p <0.001). Forty-eight percent of the pediatric trauma medical directors completed their portion of the survey. At FSCHs, 36% did not have a fellowship-trained vascular surgeon on-call schedule, 27% did not have endovascular capabilities, and 18% did not have a radiology technologist always available.

CONCLUSION

Vascular surgeons are more likely to manage pediatric vascular trauma regardless of hospital setting. However, FSCH have fewer resources available to provide optimal care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management, level IV.

摘要

背景

小儿血管创伤的处理存在差异。我们旨在确定美国外科医师学院认证的小儿创伤中心在处理血管创伤方面的实践模式,并评估在独立儿童医院(FSCH)和综合成人医院内的儿科医院管理血管创伤的可用资源。

方法

美国外科医师学院指定的小儿外科创伤中心的小儿外科医生和创伤医学主任完成了一项旨在评估创伤性动脉损伤预期处理和资源可用性的调查。使用 Fisher 精确检验和 t 检验进行医院设置比较。使用二项式检验比较小儿外科医生和血管外科医生对临床病例的反应。p 值小于或等于 0.05 为显著。

结果

414 名小儿外科医生中有 176 名(42%)参与了调查。与小儿外科医生相比,血管外科医生更有可能对所有解剖部位的血管创伤进行手术治疗,除了锁骨下动脉(p<0.001)。48%的小儿创伤医学主任完成了他们那部分的调查。在 FSCH,36%的医院没有随叫随到的 fellowship培训血管外科医生,27%的医院没有血管内治疗能力,18%的医院没有放射技师随时可用。

结论

无论医院设置如何,血管外科医生更有可能处理小儿血管创伤。然而,FSCH 提供最佳治疗的资源较少。

证据水平

治疗管理,IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验