Bettelheim H, Fourtis N
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1985 Oct;187(4):262-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051030.
Twenty-three patients presenting with clinical and angiological signs of temporal arteritis were examined by ODG and DUSG. While the results of ODG were positive in all 23 patients, DUSG failed to furnish diagnostic evidence of temporal arteritis. Findings with DUSG were positive in only 9 out of 23 patients. DUSG is less suitable than ODG as a means of diagnosing temporal arteritis.
对23例出现颞动脉炎临床和血管学体征的患者进行了光声血管造影(ODG)和双功能超声检查(DUSG)。ODG检查结果在所有23例患者中均为阳性,而DUSG未能提供颞动脉炎的诊断依据。DUSG检查结果仅在23例患者中的9例呈阳性。作为诊断颞动脉炎的手段,DUSG不如ODG合适。