• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国性别规范与婚姻动态的变化

Changing Gender Norms and Marriage Dynamics in the United States.

作者信息

Pessin Léa

机构信息

Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Address: 704 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802,.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2018 Feb;80(1):25-41. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12444. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1111/jomf.12444
PMID:29335657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5766036/
Abstract

Using a regional measure of gender norms from the General Social Surveys together with marital histories from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, this study explored how gender norms were associated with women's marriage dynamics between 1968 and 2012. Results suggested that a higher prevalence of egalitarian gender norms predicted a decline in marriage formation. This decline was, however, only true for women without a college degree. For college-educated women, the association between gender norms and marriage formation became positive when gender egalitarianism prevailed. The findings also revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between gender norms and divorce: an initial increase in divorce was observed when gender norms were predominantly traditional. The association, however, reversed as gender norms became egalitarian. No differences by education were found for divorce. The findings partially support the gender revolution framework but also highlight greater barriers to marriage for low-educated women as societies embrace gender equality.

摘要

本研究利用综合社会调查中关于性别规范的区域测量数据以及收入动态面板研究中的婚姻史数据,探讨了1968年至2012年间性别规范与女性婚姻动态之间的关联。结果表明,平等主义性别规范的较高流行率预示着结婚率的下降。然而,这种下降仅适用于没有大学学位的女性。对于受过大学教育的女性,当性别平等主义盛行时,性别规范与结婚率之间的关联变为正向。研究结果还揭示了性别规范与离婚之间呈倒U形关系:当性别规范主要为传统规范时,离婚率最初会上升。然而,随着性别规范变得平等,这种关联发生了逆转。在离婚方面未发现受教育程度的差异。这些发现部分支持了性别革命框架,但也凸显出随着社会接受性别平等,低学历女性在婚姻方面面临更大的障碍。

相似文献

1
Changing Gender Norms and Marriage Dynamics in the United States.美国性别规范与婚姻动态的变化
J Marriage Fam. 2018 Feb;80(1):25-41. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12444. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Socioeconomic, sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of the tempo of divorce.离婚节奏的社会经济、社会人口统计学及态度相关因素。
J Divorce Remarriage. 1991;16(1-2):47-68. doi: 10.1300/j087v16n01_04.
3
Women in Egypt: new roles and realities.埃及女性:新角色与现实状况
UFSI Rep. 1986(22):1-9.
4
The educational gradient in marriage: a comparison of 25 European countries.婚姻中的教育梯度:25 个欧洲国家的比较。
Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1499-520. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0229-x.
5
Age difference asymmetry and a two-sex perspective.年龄差异不对称与双性视角。
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(1):23-45. doi: 10.1007/BF01797120.
6
The duration of lone parenthood in Great Britain.英国单亲家庭的持续时间。
Eur J Popul. 1991 Jun;7(2):129-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01797100.
7
Starting over. Why remarriages are more unstable.重新开始。为何再婚关系更不稳定。
J Fam Issues. 1992 Jun;13(2):179-94. doi: 10.1177/019251392013002004.
8
Changing family roles and marital instability.家庭角色的转变与婚姻不稳定。
Probl Econ. 1981 Sep-Nov;24(5-7):191-217. doi: 10.2753/pet1061-199124050607191.
9
American families: trends and correlates.美国家庭:趋势与关联因素
Popul Index. 1993 Fall;59(3):350-86.
10
The family today: sociological highlights on an embattled institution.今日之家庭:一个陷入困境的机构的社会学要点
Europ Demogr Inf Bull. 1982;13(2):49-72.

引用本文的文献

1
"The Impact of Demographic Change on Transfers of Care and Associated Well‑being".人口结构变化对医疗护理转移及相关福祉的影响
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022 Dec;41(6):2419-2446. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09736-0. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
2
Inequitable gender norms and its associated factors among university students in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study, 2022.埃塞俄比亚南部大学生中不公平的性别规范及其相关因素:一项横断面研究,2022年
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;12:1462782. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462782. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender Equality for Whom? The Changing College Education Gradients of the Division of Paid Work and Housework Among US Couples, 1968-2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Nonmarital First Births, Marriage, and Income Inequality.非婚生育、婚姻与收入不平等
Am Sociol Rev. 2016 Aug;81(4):749-770. doi: 10.1177/0003122416653112. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
2
Family Inequality: Diverging Patterns in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing.家庭不平等:婚姻、同居与生育中的分化模式
J Econ Perspect. 2016;30(2):79-102. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.2.79.
3
Trends in Cohabitation Outcomes: Compositional Changes and Engagement Among Never-Married Young Adults.同居结果的趋势:未婚年轻人中的构成变化与参与情况
性别平等是为了谁?1968年至2019年美国夫妻有偿工作与家务分工中不断变化的大学教育梯度
Soc Forces. 2024 Feb 26;103(1):129-152. doi: 10.1093/sf/soae028. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Cohabiting couple's economic organization and marriage patterns across social classes.不同社会阶层中同居伴侣的经济组织与婚姻模式。
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Jun;86(3):762-786. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12947. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Individual's gender ideology and happiness in China.中国人的性别意识形态与幸福感。
Chin Sociol Rev. 2022;54(3):252-277. doi: 10.1080/21620555.2021.1871727. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Obstacles to Birth Surname Retention Upon Marriage: How Do Hostile Sexism and System Justification Predict Support for Marital Surname Change Among Women?婚后保留姓氏的障碍:敌对性别歧视和制度正当性如何预测女性对婚后更改姓氏的支持?
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 4;12:702553. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702553. eCollection 2021.
7
Country differences in the link between gender-role attitudes and marital centrality: Evidence from 24 countries.性别角色态度与婚姻核心地位之间联系的国家差异:来自24个国家的证据。
Int J Comp Sociol. 2020 Oct;61(5):291-309. doi: 10.1177/0020715220985922. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
His and Her Education and Marital Dissolution: Adding a Contextual Dimension.他与她的教育程度及婚姻解体:增添一个背景维度
Eur J Popul. 2017 Nov 21;34(4):663-687. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9448-y. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Navigating between two cultures: Immigrants' gender attitudes toward working women.在两种文化之间穿梭:移民对职业女性的性别态度。
Demogr Res. 2018 Jan-Jun;38:967-1016. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.35. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Aug;76(4):826-842. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12123. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American Families, 1800-2015.父权制、权力与薪酬:1800 - 2015年的美国家庭变迁
Demography. 2015 Dec;52(6):1797-823. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0440-z.
5
Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.我们能完成这场革命吗?性别、工作与家庭理想以及制度约束。
Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Feb;80(1):116-139. doi: 10.1177/0003122414564008.
6
Class advantage and the gender divide: flexibility on the job and at home.阶级优势与性别差异:工作与家庭中的灵活性。
AJS. 2014 Sep;120(2):395-431. doi: 10.1086/678270.
7
The educational gradient in marriage: a comparison of 25 European countries.婚姻中的教育梯度:25 个欧洲国家的比较。
Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1499-520. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0229-x.
8
The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008.性别革命的终结?1977 年至 2008 年的性别角色态度。
AJS. 2011 Jul;117(1):259-89. doi: 10.1086/658853.
9
Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage?俄罗斯的非婚生育:第二次人口转变还是不利模式?
Demography. 2011 Feb;48(1):317-42. doi: 10.1007/s13524-010-0001-4.
10
Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States.同居与儿童的生活安排:来自美国的新估计数据
Demogr Res. 2008;19:1663-1692. doi: 10.4054/demres.2008.19.47.