• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的员工准备情况:工具的开发和验证。

Staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes: Instrument development and validation.

机构信息

The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Hong Kong Association of Gerontology, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 May;18(5):745-749. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13244. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1111/ggi.13244
PMID:29336103
Abstract

AIM

Although much attention has been on integrating the palliative care approach into services of long-term care homes for older people living with frailty and progressive diseases, little is known about the staff preparedness for these new initiatives. The present study aimed to develop and test the psychometric properties of an instrument for measuring care home staff preparedness in providing palliative and end-of-life care.

METHODS

A 16-item instrument, covering perceived knowledge, skill and psychological readiness, was developed. A total of 247 staff members of different ranks from four care homes participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis using the principal component analysis extraction method with varimax rotation was carried out for initial validation. Known group comparison was carried out to examine its discriminant validity. Reliability of the instrument was assessed based on test-retest reliability of a subsample of 20 participants and the Cronbach's alpha of the items.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the instrument yielded a three-factor solution, which cumulatively accounted for 68.5% of the total variance. Three subscales, namely, willingness, capability and resilience, showed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It also showed good discriminant validity between staff members of professional and non-professional groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a brief, valid and reliable scale for measuring care home staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care. It can be used to identify their concerns and training needs in providing palliative and end-of-life care, and as an outcome measure to evaluate the effects of interventional studies for capacity building in this regard. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 745-749.

摘要

目的

尽管人们已经关注将姑息治疗方法整合到为患有虚弱和进行性疾病的老年人提供服务的长期护理院服务中,但对于这些新举措的工作人员准备情况却知之甚少。本研究旨在开发和测试一种用于衡量护理院工作人员提供姑息治疗和临终关怀准备情况的工具的心理测量学特性。

方法

开发了一个包含感知知识、技能和心理准备的 16 项工具。共有来自 4 家养老院的 247 名不同职级的员工参与了这项研究。采用主成分分析提取方法和方差极大旋转进行探索性因素分析,对初始有效性进行验证。采用已知组比较来检验其判别效度。通过对 20 名参与者的子样本进行测试-重测信度和项目的克朗巴赫 α 来评估仪器的可靠性。

结果

探索性因素分析显示,该工具产生了一个三因素解决方案,累计解释了总方差的 68.5%。三个分量表,即意愿、能力和弹性,表现出较高的内部一致性和测试-重测信度。它还显示了专业和非专业人员之间的良好判别效度。

结论

这是一种用于衡量护理院工作人员提供姑息治疗和临终关怀准备情况的简短、有效且可靠的量表。它可用于识别他们在提供姑息治疗和临终关怀方面的关注点和培训需求,并可作为评估干预性研究在这方面建立能力的效果的结果测量。老年医学与老年病学国际 2018 年;18:745-749.

相似文献

1
Staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes: Instrument development and validation.长期护理机构提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的员工准备情况:工具的开发和验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 May;18(5):745-749. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13244. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
2
An instrument to assess the education needs of nursing assistants within a palliative approach in residential aged care facilities.评估安养院姑息护理模式下护理助理教育需求的工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0447-0.
3
Are care staff equipped for end-of-life communication? A cross-sectional study in long-term care facilities to identify determinants of self-efficacy.护理人员是否具备临终沟通能力?一项在长期护理机构中进行的横断面研究,旨在确定自我效能感的决定因素。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 8;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0388-z.
4
The Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale: validity and reliability assessments.老年人健康评估量表:效度与信度评估
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Apr;71(4):942-51. doi: 10.1111/jan.12593. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
5
Psychometric analysis of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument.心理计量学分析在缓和医疗与临终关怀中的沟通舒适度量表(C-COPE)。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2020 Dec 2;26(8):404-412. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.404.
6
A measure of palliative care in nursing homes.养老院姑息治疗的一项衡量指标。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
7
Initial validation of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale: study of Portuguese end-of-life cancer patients.癌症心理适应简易量表(Mini-MAC)的初步验证:葡萄牙临终癌症患者研究
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Oct;18(5):534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 29.
8
The Perinatal Palliative Care Perceptions and Barriers Scale Instrument©: development and validation.围产期姑息治疗认知与障碍量表©:编制与验证
Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Dec;11(6):397-403. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318233809a.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).以患者为中心的气候问卷中文版——员工版(PCQ-S)的心理测量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250.
10
The Revised Index for Social Engagement in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Psychometric Study.《长期护理机构社会参与度修订指数:一项心理测量学研究》
J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;25(3):216-223. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000156.

引用本文的文献

1
End-of-life care preparedness and educational needs among nursing staff of long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional study.长期护理机构护理人员的临终关怀准备情况及教育需求:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 28;24(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03244-0.
2
Places of living and places of dying: the case for preventing suicide in residential long-term care.生活之地与死亡之地:预防长期住院护理机构中自杀行为的理由
Ageing Soc. 2021 Sep;41(9):1945-1960. doi: 10.1017/s0144686x20000173. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Quality of Palliative and End-Of-Life Care in Hong Kong: Perspectives of Healthcare Providers.
香港缓和医疗和临终关怀的质量:医疗保健提供者的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 16;17(14):5130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145130.