• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理计量学分析在缓和医疗与临终关怀中的沟通舒适度量表(C-COPE)。

Psychometric analysis of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument.

机构信息

College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota.

College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, South Dakota.

出版信息

Int J Palliat Nurs. 2020 Dec 2;26(8):404-412. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.404.

DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.404
PMID:33331209
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses must be comfortable facilitating palliative and end-of-life communication with patients and their families.

AIM

A validated instrument measuring the comfort of nurses with conducting end-of-life communication is essential for meeting the goals and wishes of patient care. This study aimed to develop and conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument.

METHODS

Face, content, and construct validity, including test-retest reliability, were conducted.

RESULTS

Four experts subjectively confirmed face content validity and the quantitative item content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.67 to 1 and scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.98. Principal axis factoring with Promax rotation yielded a five-factor solution accounting for 66.2% of the variance. The items loading on the five factors ranged from 0.46-0.96 (factor 1), 0.67-0.93 (factor 2), 0.49-0.86 (factor 3), 0.68-0.79 (factor 4), and 0.24-0.96 (factor 5). Internal consistency reliability (coefficient a) was 0.90 for the total C-COPE, and above 0.75 for each factor. The five factors are 'cultural/spiritual considerations,' 'team considerations,' 'addressing decision-making,' 'addressing symptomatology,' and 'deliberate awareness.' Test-retest reliability yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (CI 95%, 0.82-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-COPE is a reliable and valid instrument measuring nurse comfort with palliative and end of-life care communication, yet requires testing in more diverse samples.

摘要

背景

护士必须能够与患者及其家属舒适地进行姑息治疗和临终沟通。

目的

衡量护士进行临终沟通舒适度的验证工具对于实现患者护理的目标和愿望至关重要。本研究旨在开发并进行姑息治疗和临终关怀沟通舒适度量表(C-COPE)的心理测量评估。

方法

进行了表面、内容和结构有效性评估,包括测试-重测信度。

结果

四位专家主观确认了表面内容有效性,定量项目内容有效性指数(I-CVI)范围为 0.67 至 1,量表内容有效性指数(S-CVI/Ave)为 0.98。采用 Promax 旋转的主成分因子分析得出一个五因素解决方案,占方差的 66.2%。五个因素的项目负荷范围为 0.46-0.96(因素 1)、0.67-0.93(因素 2)、0.49-0.86(因素 3)、0.68-0.79(因素 4)和 0.24-0.96(因素 5)。C-COPE 的总内部一致性信度(系数 a)为 0.90,每个因素均高于 0.75。五个因素是“文化/精神考虑”、“团队考虑”、“解决决策问题”、“解决症状”和“有意识的意识”。测试-重测信度产生了 0.87 的组内相关系数(ICC)(95%CI,0.82-0.91)。

结论

C-COPE 是一种可靠且有效的衡量护士对姑息治疗和临终关怀沟通舒适度的工具,但需要在更多样化的样本中进行测试。

相似文献

1
Psychometric analysis of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument.心理计量学分析在缓和医疗与临终关怀中的沟通舒适度量表(C-COPE)。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2020 Dec 2;26(8):404-412. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.404.
2
Staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes: Instrument development and validation.长期护理机构提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的员工准备情况:工具的开发和验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 May;18(5):745-749. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13244. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Adaption of the Casey-Fink Survey Tool for Nurse Residency Programs: Making It Relevant for Hospice and Palliative Care Nurse Residency Programs.凯西-芬克调查工具在护士住院医师培训计划中的应用:使它与临终关怀和姑息治疗护士住院医师培训计划相关。
J Nurs Adm. 2023 Jun 1;53(6):307-312. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001291. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nurse-specific end-of-life professional caregiver survey: a cross-sectional study.护士特定临终专业照护者量表中文版的文化调适与心理计量学评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Feb 16;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00725-2.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the Moral Comfort Questionnaire.道德舒适度问卷的心理测量评估
J Nurs Meas. 2024 Mar 14;32(1):141-151. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0035.
6
Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis.捷克综合姑息治疗结局量表的心理测量学特性:信度和内容效度分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 25;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x.
7
Adaptation and psychometric testing of the end-of-life professional caregiver survey in Jamaica.《牙买加终末期专业照护者调查的调适与心理计量学测试》。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 16;23(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09497-2.
8
The Neonatal Palliative Care Attitude Scale: Psychometric properties for Portuguese neonatal nurses.新生儿姑息治疗态度量表:新生儿护士的心理测量学特性。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Jun;22(3):571-576. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000797.
9
Revision and Validation of the Chinese Version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire for ICU End-of-Life Patients.修订和验证中文版 McGill 重症监护病房临终患者生活质量问卷
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;38(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/08258597211067012. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
10
Psychometrics of the Persian version of the program in palliative care education and practice questionnaire (German revised - PPCEP-GR).姑息治疗教育与实践问卷(德国修订版 - PPCEP-GR)波斯文版的心理测量学。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jun 23;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01196-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Hospice Comfort Questionnaire-Patient (HCQ-P).《临终关怀舒适问卷-患者版(HCQ-P)》中文版的改编与验证
PeerJ. 2025 Jun 10;13:e19562. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19562. eCollection 2025.