Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激对慢性耳鸣短期和长期治疗的效果

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on short-term and long-term treatment of chronic tinnitus.

作者信息

Abtahi Hamidreza, Okhovvat Ahmadreza, Heidari Somaiie, Gharagazarloo Azar, Mirdamadi Motahare, Nilforoush Mohammad Hossein, Ghazavi Hossein

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Communication Disorders Research Center, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar-Apr;39(2):94-96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of anodal and cathodal methods in reducing the intensity of tinnitus and to compare them with the control.

METHODOLOGY

This randomized double-blind clinical trial with case and control groups was conducted in Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan between 2015 and 2016. In this trial, 51 patients with tinnitus, for at least one year, were selected among those outpatients visiting the throat, nose and ear clinic within this period. Inclusion criteria were patients on electrical stimulation prohibition, with Ménière's disease, otosclerosis, chronic headache, and pulsatile tinnitus. Patients were randomly divided in three equal-sized groups: anodal stimulation group, cathodal stimulation group, and control group. The subjects received 20-min current stimulation (2 mA). Five subjects were selected from those with a significant difference between the stimulated states (anodal or cathodal) and/or control. They received weekly transcranial electrical stimulation for two months, and their long-term recovery from tinnitus was investigated. Data analysis was done with SPSS20.

RESULTS

Findings showed no significant between-groups difference in mean scores of tinnitus before the intervention (p = .68); whereas, this difference was significant immediately after the intervention (p = .02) and 1 h after it (p = .03). The mean score of tinnitus in the anodal stimulation group was significantly lower than the control; whereas, no significant difference was observed between the anodal and cathodal stimulation groups, and between the cathodal and control groups (p < .05). Findings also showed that the mean scores of tinnitus in two cathodal stimulation groups (p = .24) and control group (p = .62) were not significantly different at three different points of time; whereas, this score was significantly different in the anodal group at these time points (p = .01).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, anodal stimulation was more effective than the cathodal and control stimulation in reducing the intensity of tinnitus in the short term.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查阳极和阴极方法在降低耳鸣强度方面的有效性,并将它们与对照组进行比较。

方法

本随机双盲临床试验设有病例组和对照组,于2015年至2016年在伊斯法罕的扎赫拉医院进行。在该试验中,从这段时间内前往耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的患者中选取了51名耳鸣至少一年的患者。纳入标准为禁止进行电刺激、患有梅尼埃病、耳硬化症、慢性头痛和搏动性耳鸣的患者。患者被随机分为三个等规模的组:阳极刺激组、阴极刺激组和对照组。受试者接受20分钟的电流刺激(2毫安)。从刺激状态(阳极或阴极)和/或对照组之间存在显著差异的患者中选取了5名受试者。他们接受了为期两个月的每周一次经颅电刺激,并对其耳鸣的长期恢复情况进行了调查。使用SPSS20进行数据分析。

结果

结果显示,干预前耳鸣平均得分在组间无显著差异(p = 0.68);然而,干预后立即(p = 0.02)和干预后1小时(p = 0.03)这种差异具有显著性。阳极刺激组的耳鸣平均得分显著低于对照组;而阳极和阴极刺激组之间以及阴极和对照组之间未观察到显著差异(p < 0.05)。结果还显示,在三个不同时间点,两个阴极刺激组(p = 0.24)和对照组(p = 0.62)的耳鸣平均得分无显著差异;而在这些时间点,阳极组的该得分有显著差异(p = 0.01)。

结论

总之,在短期内,阳极刺激在降低耳鸣强度方面比阴极和对照刺激更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验