Suppr超能文献

内感受准确性的潜在状态-特质分析

A latent state-trait analysis of interoceptive accuracy.

作者信息

Wittkamp Martin F, Bertsch Katja, Vögele Claus, Schulz André

机构信息

Clinical Psychophysiology Laboratory, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13055. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13055. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

Abstract

Interoceptive accuracy (IAc), that is, the ability to accurately perceive one's own bodily signals, is widely assumed to be a trait, although experimental manipulations such as stress may affect IAc. We used structural equation modeling to estimate the reliability of IAc, and the proportions of individual differences in IAc, explained by a trait and occasion-specific effects of situation and person-situation interactions. We assessed IAc in 59 healthy participants (40 women, M  = 23.4 years) on three consecutive measurement occasions, approximately 1 week apart, in a rest and poststress condition, using a heartbeat counting and a heartbeat discrimination task. The results showed fair temporal stability (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.38) and good reliability (Mdn = .63; range .49-.83) for both methods. While around 40% of the variance of a single IAc measurement could be explained by a trait, approximately 27% was accounted for by occasion-specific effects of situation and person-situation interaction. These results suggest that IAc measures are relatively consistent and that situations and person-situation interactions impact IAc as measured at a certain point in time. An aggregation across at least two measurements is recommended when using IAc as a trait variable.

摘要

内感受准确性(IAc),即准确感知自身身体信号的能力,尽管诸如压力等实验操作可能会影响IAc,但人们普遍认为它是一种特质。我们使用结构方程模型来估计IAc的可靠性,以及IAc中个体差异的比例,这些差异由特质、情境的特定场合效应以及人 - 情境交互作用来解释。我们在休息和应激后状态下,使用心跳计数和心跳辨别任务,对59名健康参与者(40名女性,平均年龄M = 23.4岁)进行了连续三次测量,每次测量间隔约1周。结果表明,两种方法都具有相当的时间稳定性(组内相关系数≥0.38)和良好的可靠性(中位数 = 0.63;范围0.49 - 0.83)。虽然单次IAc测量的约40%的方差可以由特质来解释,但约27%是由情境的特定场合效应和人 - 情境交互作用所导致的。这些结果表明,IAc测量相对一致,并且情境和人 - 情境交互作用会影响在某个时间点测量的IAc。当将IAc用作特质变量时,建议至少进行两次测量的汇总。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验