• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体育活动的奖励效应预测健康志愿者对安非他命急性主观效应的敏感性。

Rewarding effects of physical activity predict sensitivity to the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

1 Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

2 Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;32(3):302-308. doi: 10.1177/0269881117748901. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1177/0269881117748901
PMID:29338486
Abstract

While individual differences in reward sensitivity are believed to generalize across drugs and alternative rewards, this notion has received little empirical attention in human research. Here, we tested whether individual differences in the subjective rewarding effects of physical activity were associated with the subjective response to d-amphetamine administration. Healthy volunteers ( n=95; age 18-35 years) completed questionnaires measuring the self-reported pleasurable effects of physical activity and other covariates, and this was followed by two double-blind counterbalanced sessions during which they received either 20 mg oral d-amphetamine or placebo. Subjective drug effects measures were collected before and repeatedly after drug administration. Subjective d-amphetamine-related effects were then reduced via principal components analysis into latent factors of "positive mood," "arousal," and "drug high." Multiple regression models controlling for placebo-related scores, session order, demographics, body mass index, level of physical activity, and use of other drugs showed that degree of self-reported physical activity reward was positively associated with d-amphetamine-induced positive mood and arousal ( βs≥0.25, ps≤0.04), but was not associated with d-amphetamine-induced changes in drug high ( β=0.13, p=0.24). These results provide novel evidence suggesting that individual differences in reward sensitivity cross over between d-amphetamine reward and physical activity reward in humans.

摘要

虽然人们普遍认为,对奖赏的敏感性存在个体差异,这种差异会体现在不同药物和其他奖赏上,但人类研究对此关注甚少。在此,我们测试了个体对体育活动主观奖赏效应的差异是否与个体对安非他命给药的主观反应有关。健康志愿者(n=95;年龄 18-35 岁)完成了衡量体育活动的自我报告愉悦效应和其他协变量的问卷,随后进行了两次双盲对照实验,在此期间,他们分别接受了 20 毫克口服安非他命或安慰剂。给药前和给药后反复收集了主观药物效应测量值。然后通过主成分分析将与药物相关的主观效应分为“积极情绪”、“兴奋”和“药物快感”三个潜在因素。控制安慰剂相关评分、实验顺序、人口统计学、体重指数、身体活动水平和其他药物使用的多元回归模型显示,自我报告的体育活动奖赏程度与安非他命引起的积极情绪和兴奋呈正相关(βs≥0.25,ps≤0.04),但与安非他命引起的药物快感变化无关(β=0.13,p=0.24)。这些结果提供了新的证据,表明人类对奖赏的敏感性个体差异存在于安非他命奖赏和体育活动奖赏之间的交叉。

相似文献

1
Rewarding effects of physical activity predict sensitivity to the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers.体育活动的奖励效应预测健康志愿者对安非他命急性主观效应的敏感性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;32(3):302-308. doi: 10.1177/0269881117748901. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers.情绪特质可预测健康志愿者中安非他命诱发的积极情绪的个体差异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4091-y. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
3
Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.主观反应预测健康志愿者对安非他命的选择。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 May;204:173158. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173158. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.人格与人类服用 d-苯丙胺后的急性主观效应。
J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;27(3):256-64. doi: 10.1177/0269881112472564. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
5
Anticipation of monetary reward in amygdala, insula, caudate are predictors of pleasure sensitivity to d-Amphetamine administration.杏仁核、岛叶和尾状核中对货币奖励的预期是 d-安非他命给药后快感敏感性的预测指标。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107725. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107725. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者的人格与急性苯丙胺的主观效应
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May;31(5):1064-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300939.
7
Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity.对金钱奖励的神经激活与安非他命的奖励敏感性有关。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1738-1744. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0042-8. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine.压力引起的情绪变化和皮质醇释放可预测安非他命对情绪的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
9
Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.甜味喜好与女性对安非他命的主观反应有关,但与男性无关。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Nov;234(21):3185-3194. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4702-x. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Contextual conditioning enhances the psychostimulant and incentive properties of d-amphetamine in humans.语境条件作用增强了人类体内 d-苯丙胺的精神兴奋剂和激励特性。
Addict Biol. 2013 Nov;18(6):985-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00416.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Amphetamine Modulation of Long-Term Object Recognition Memory in Rats: Influence of Stress.苯丙胺对大鼠长期物体识别记忆的调节作用:应激的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Feb 24;12:644521. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.644521. eCollection 2021.