Jozkowski Amanda C, Presgraves Echo A, Hodges Krista L, Wirth Erica N, Brandstetter Nicole E, Thayer Molly T
1 Towson University, MD, USA.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2018 Apr;38(2):121-130. doi: 10.1177/1539449217753349. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Research has reported on traditional methods of assessing interrater reliability but, currently, no such standard protocol exists for selection of alternative methods of assessing interrater reliability, such as wearable video cameras. The professions of occupational therapy and occupational science take a unique ecological perspective when evaluating individuals, which focuses on the naturalistic perspective of an individual, ideally resulting in optimal performance. Given current advancements in technology, wearable, low-cost, unobtrusive, first-person view digital video cameras are readily available for use in research. The researchers generated an original rubric for critiquing cameras, then trialed four cameras for use in a future interrater reliability study. This standardized protocol fills a gap in the field and can be used by future researchers searching for a standardized method of camera selection.
已有研究报道了评估评分者间信度的传统方法，但目前尚无用于选择评估评分者间信度替代方法（如可穿戴摄像机）的标准方案。职业治疗和职业科学专业在评估个体时采用独特的生态视角，该视角侧重于个体的自然主义视角，理想情况下能实现最佳表现。鉴于当前技术的进步，可穿戴、低成本、不引人注意的第一人称视角数字摄像机已可随时用于研究。研究人员制定了一份用于评判摄像机的原创性评分标准，然后试用了四台摄像机，以供未来的评分者间信度研究使用。这一标准化方案填补了该领域的空白，可供未来寻求摄像机选择标准化方法的研究人员使用。
